<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It is almost hard to believe now that there was a time when railfanning around the Niagara Region could keep a Railfan busy all day, even Niagara Falls was still a busy railroad town. Back in 2002 CN Niagara Falls yard was still a busy place, not just for CN but NS run-through trains as well. While the stack trains to Dain City were history, NS still had through trains 327 / 328 and the NS Buffalo to Niagara Falls turn job 445. ON this day venerable former Conrail Dash-8 8202 was pulling off the Stamford sub. at Cliffton and about to back into the CN yard. Sadly today these old Dash-8&#8242;s are long gone along with CN&#8217;s yard in the &#8220;Falls&#8221;. Today NS only runs as far as Fort Erie, and trains 327 / 328 are history as well.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/it-is-almost-hard-to-believe-now-that-there-was-a-time-when-railfanning-around-the-niagara-region-could-keep-a-railfan-busy-all-day-even-niagara-falls-was-still-a-busy-railroad-town-back-in-2002-cn/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 13:45:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=46240#comment-47612</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 02:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/img20210728_17043877.jpeg#comment-47612</guid>
		<description>According to my Conrail book, there were only 10 of the C32-8&#039;s originally numbered 6610-6619, some received the grey ballast express paint job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to my Conrail book, there were only 10 of the C32-8&#8242;s originally numbered 6610-6619, some received the grey ballast express paint job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=46240#comment-47606</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 23:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/img20210728_17043877.jpeg#comment-47606</guid>
		<description>Neat. I had no idea what they were back then. Just another non EMD... I managed a few on camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat. I had no idea what they were back then. Just another non EMD&#8230; I managed a few on camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=46240#comment-47605</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 23:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/img20210728_17043877.jpeg#comment-47605</guid>
		<description>They lasted until 2008, I believe, but it wasn&#039;t often you spotted these away from the Boston Line....and they had to be rare in Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They lasted until 2008, I believe, but it wasn&#8217;t often you spotted these away from the Boston Line&#8230;.and they had to be rare in Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=46240#comment-47604</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 23:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/img20210728_17043877.jpeg#comment-47604</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t these last a few more years? I swear I got quite a few of these (NS or CR) on 327/8 well into 2006..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t these last a few more years? I swear I got quite a few of these (NS or CR) on 327/8 well into 2006..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brundle</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=46240#comment-47603</link>
		<dc:creator>Brundle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 20:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/img20210728_17043877.jpeg#comment-47603</guid>
		<description>One of the more unusual looking GE&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the more unusual looking GE&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=46240#comment-47598</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/img20210728_17043877.jpeg#comment-47598</guid>
		<description>I agree. This is a rare find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. This is a rare find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noe</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=46240#comment-47597</link>
		<dc:creator>Noe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 18:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/img20210728_17043877.jpeg#comment-47597</guid>
		<description>This was a neat catch as there would likely not have been many NS C39-8’s remaining at that time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a neat catch as there would likely not have been many NS C39-8’s remaining at that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
