<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It is late fall but the hillside colours look pretty good. The lands look a bit cleaner as far as bushes and weeds are concerned compared to nowadays.
It is late in the day as VIA #76 approaches the junction running eastward. Some rolling stock is evident in the new VIA colours, but old CN power is still in charge. CN 4104, a GP9 later became CN 4364 and then in 1986 converted to slug #240. Trailing unit CN 3100, an RS-18, was retired from the roster by 1992.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/it-is-late-fall-but-the-hillside-colours-look-pretty-good-the-lands-look-a-bit-cleaner-as-far-as-bushes-and-weeds-are-concerned-compared-to-nowadays-it-is-late-in-the-day-as-via-76-approaches-the/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 23:56:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Parks</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39689#comment-36268</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Parks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 22:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Bayview-scenes-10-78449-edited.jpg#comment-36268</guid>
		<description>I like the combination of units, plus the steam generator. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the combination of units, plus the steam generator. <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robin lowrie</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39689#comment-36261</link>
		<dc:creator>robin lowrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 16:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Bayview-scenes-10-78449-edited.jpg#comment-36261</guid>
		<description>both these loco types ran long hood-forward on CN so this is a normal arrangement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>both these loco types ran long hood-forward on CN so this is a normal arrangement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cdntrainphotog</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39689#comment-36260</link>
		<dc:creator>Cdntrainphotog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Bayview-scenes-10-78449-edited.jpg#comment-36260</guid>
		<description>That must be a &quot;transition&quot; picture. Was it common at that time for the locomotives to be coupled short hood to short hood?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That must be a &#8220;transition&#8221; picture. Was it common at that time for the locomotives to be coupled short hood to short hood?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
