<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s hard these days not to get excited when you can catch a trio of GP9 working together in 2017. CN&#8217;s local out of Aldershot this morning had exactly that as it pulled along the SOR yard job in Hamilton. Sadly the leader has numerous scares on it from years of hard work, never the less it is still employed by CN thanks to the reliability CN&#8217;s fleet of GP9RM&#8217;s have provided over the decades.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/its-hard-these-days-not-to-get-excited-when-you-can-catch-a-trio-of-gp9-working-together-in-2017-cns-local-out-of-aldershot-this-morning-had-exactly-that-as-it-pulled-along-the-sor-yard-job-in-ha/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:34:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=30901#comment-23690</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 17:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/IMG_6456.jpg#comment-23690</guid>
		<description>3403 has made a few runs up to Brantford but still has the bugs.  3840 should have been picked up by 421 sometime last week to ship out for rebuild.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3403 has made a few runs up to Brantford but still has the bugs.  3840 should have been picked up by 421 sometime last week to ship out for rebuild.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=30901#comment-23625</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 05:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/IMG_6456.jpg#comment-23625</guid>
		<description>The 3403 is behind 4003 to the right, and yes 2081 was busy in the yard :) The 3840 was at the north end of the yard, not being used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 3403 is behind 4003 to the right, and yes 2081 was busy in the yard <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  The 3840 was at the north end of the yard, not being used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=30901#comment-23617</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/IMG_6456.jpg#comment-23617</guid>
		<description>Long live the GP9&#039;s on CN - I say that now but I know the end will come. I am very much enjoying CN&#039;s roster right now and relishing my time with the GP9&#039;s. The 567&#039;s sound very very good.

Joe, can&#039;t test a six axle unit in Hamilton - has to go to Brantford to the Hagersville for proper dynamic testing, then sent back to the shop in Hamilton for further changes as needed. That&#039;s probably 2081 in the photo working the yard, not sure where 3403 would be in this shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long live the GP9&#8242;s on CN &#8211; I say that now but I know the end will come. I am very much enjoying CN&#8217;s roster right now and relishing my time with the GP9&#8242;s. The 567&#8242;s sound very very good.</p>
<p>Joe, can&#8217;t test a six axle unit in Hamilton &#8211; has to go to Brantford to the Hagersville for proper dynamic testing, then sent back to the shop in Hamilton for further changes as needed. That&#8217;s probably 2081 in the photo working the yard, not sure where 3403 would be in this shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=30901#comment-23612</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 16:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/IMG_6456.jpg#comment-23612</guid>
		<description>SOR must have really messed up 3403 for it to still be down in Hamilton...it came up to Brantford last week and went right back down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SOR must have really messed up 3403 for it to still be down in Hamilton&#8230;it came up to Brantford last week and went right back down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Streit</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=30901#comment-23602</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Streit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 16:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/IMG_6456.jpg#comment-23602</guid>
		<description>Incredibly, CN has over 100 GP9RM&#039;s still active! Sixty+ year old technology, albeit significantly updated, in daily service. Unprecedented, aside from perhaps a couple of lake freighters, compared to other forms of transportation. Imagine Air Canada still flying 707&#039;s or DC8&#039;s!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incredibly, CN has over 100 GP9RM&#8217;s still active! Sixty+ year old technology, albeit significantly updated, in daily service. Unprecedented, aside from perhaps a couple of lake freighters, compared to other forms of transportation. Imagine Air Canada still flying 707&#8242;s or DC8&#8242;s!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extra 1014</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=30901#comment-23596</link>
		<dc:creator>Extra 1014</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 02:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/IMG_6456.jpg#comment-23596</guid>
		<description>Wow! Very excellent photo Marcus.  :-)
I&#039;m going to add to Paul&#039;s comment with, 2 different railroads, 5 loco&#039;s in the picture and nothing is painted in a common livery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Very excellent photo Marcus.  <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I&#8217;m going to add to Paul&#8217;s comment with, 2 different railroads, 5 loco&#8217;s in the picture and nothing is painted in a common livery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul O'Shell</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=30901#comment-23594</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul O'Shell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 01:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/IMG_6456.jpg#comment-23594</guid>
		<description>3 GP9&#039;s and 3 different paint schemes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 GP9&#8242;s and 3 different paint schemes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
