<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Last June, CP 318 dropped off CN 7300 (an SW1200RSm) at Exporail, as CN had donated it to the museum. Here it sits outside the shop area, where a trackmobile is barely visible. CN 7300 was built by GMD in London, Ontario as CN 1382 in 1960. CN rebuilt it in 1987 when it got its new number. A few months later CN 7300 was repainted into its original paint scheme.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/last-june-cp-318-dropped-off-cn-7300-an-sw1200rsm-at-exporail-as-cn-had-donated-it-to-the-museum-here-it-sits-outside-the-shop-area-where-a-trackmobile-is-barely-visible-cn-7300-was-built-by-gm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 01:39:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cpcnguy</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18042#comment-8365</link>
		<dc:creator>cpcnguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/DSC_0332.jpg#comment-8365</guid>
		<description>I agree with RLK. It doesn&#039;t seem right to repaint it into its original scheme when it has been rebuilt. Although I do agree some need to have their original heritage restored, this just doesn&#039;t seem like one of those cases. Regardless, nice photo Michael.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with RLK. It doesn&#8217;t seem right to repaint it into its original scheme when it has been rebuilt. Although I do agree some need to have their original heritage restored, this just doesn&#8217;t seem like one of those cases. Regardless, nice photo Michael.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mberry</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18042#comment-8348</link>
		<dc:creator>mberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/DSC_0332.jpg#comment-8348</guid>
		<description>I seem to be in the minority, but I have no problem with them repainting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to be in the minority, but I have no problem with them repainting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RLK2211</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=18042#comment-8347</link>
		<dc:creator>RLK2211</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/DSC_0332.jpg#comment-8347</guid>
		<description>The way it should&#039;ve been left</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way it should&#8217;ve been left</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
