<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Late April, the leaves are just beginning; and I am up on the hillside enjoying the day. It is mid-afternoon by the looks of it, and in this pre-VIA image, CN 6530 and 6527 take a westbound passenger towards Copetown Hill and London.  There are various cars on the stub track behind the loco, as well as an old wooden CN caboose, partly visible on the extreme left. Adds a bit of &#8220;age&#8221; to the photo.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/late-april-the-leaves-are-just-beginning-and-i-am-up-on-the-hillside-enjoying-the-day-it-is-mid-afternoon-by-the-looks-of-it-and-in-this-pre-via-image-cn-6530-and-6527-take-a-westbound-passenger/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 15:49:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28134#comment-21336</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2017 02:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Bayview-Jct-Edited.jpg#comment-21336</guid>
		<description>Just looking over this photo tonight and I guess I should have mentioned there is NO walkbridge in the background. Everyone takes for granted it has been there forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just looking over this photo tonight and I guess I should have mentioned there is NO walkbridge in the background. Everyone takes for granted it has been there forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extra 1014</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28134#comment-19483</link>
		<dc:creator>Extra 1014</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 06:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Bayview-Jct-Edited.jpg#comment-19483</guid>
		<description>I also like this version of the F-unit cab with black around the windows. Thanks for posting this.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also like this version of the F-unit cab with black around the windows. Thanks for posting this.  <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28134#comment-19474</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 02:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Bayview-Jct-Edited.jpg#comment-19474</guid>
		<description>No. I had written 6527 in my notes from way back but obviously that is wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. I had written 6527 in my notes from way back but obviously that is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nsscot</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28134#comment-19473</link>
		<dc:creator>nsscot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 02:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Bayview-Jct-Edited.jpg#comment-19473</guid>
		<description>so what&#039;s the 2nd unit  looks like a 67xx any idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so what&#8217;s the 2nd unit  looks like a 67xx any idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28134#comment-19472</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 02:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Bayview-Jct-Edited.jpg#comment-19472</guid>
		<description>No. It was just a stub by this time, open on the east end. Maintenance equipment occupied the track, the caboose probably part of such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. It was just a stub by this time, open on the east end. Maintenance equipment occupied the track, the caboose probably part of such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28134#comment-19468</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 01:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Bayview-Jct-Edited.jpg#comment-19468</guid>
		<description>Curious, what the caboose was for? were there pushers stationed there at the time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious, what the caboose was for? were there pushers stationed there at the time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
