<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Misplaced my notes. However, the slide is marked &#8216;July 1978&#8242; and this is just your standard eastbound passenger train of the day coming off the Dundas Sub to Bayview &amp; the Oakville Sub. The lead unit on this train, 6765 was retired by 1080 but has been preserved.
A number of units in the early years of VIA when painted to the corporate colours retained &#8220;CN&#8221; on the nose for a couple of years. Why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/misplaced-my-notes-however-the-slide-is-marked-july-1978-and-this-is-just-your-standard-eastbound-passenger-train-of-the-day-coming-off-the-dundas-sub-to-bayview-the-oakville-sub-the-lead/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:54:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=36669#comment-31827</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 01:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/VIA-CN-edited.jpg#comment-31827</guid>
		<description>I enjoy the photos of a VIA nose with a CN logo. Talk about brand confusion. I think this may be one reason VIA may never bring this scheme back for a &#039;heritage&#039; unit.. but I&#039;d challenge &#039;em to prove me wrong :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy the photos of a VIA nose with a CN logo. Talk about brand confusion. I think this may be one reason VIA may never bring this scheme back for a &#8216;heritage&#8217; unit.. but I&#8217;d challenge &#8216;em to prove me wrong <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
