<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Never was a fan of these Bombardier products. Most of them were not around all that long, having been plagued with maintenance problems. I was rather surprised to see, when consulting the Trackside Guide, that this particular LRC, #6926; (built in 1983, retired in 2000) actually went on to an extended life at the Federal Railroad Administration in Texas as DOTX 218.
Nice fall afternoon. A scene begging for the sunshine that, for me, never came.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/never-was-a-fan-of-these-bombardier-products-most-of-them-were-not-around-all-that-long-having-been-plagued-with-maintenance-problems-i-was-rather-surprised-to-see-when-consulting-the-trackside-gu/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 03:32:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aitch</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=47222#comment-49161</link>
		<dc:creator>Aitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2021 18:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/VIA-6926-HW-658-edited.jpg#comment-49161</guid>
		<description>I wondered if it was lined for 725. It had a reliable departure time from Hamilton making it a personal favourite for this newbie railfan. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondered if it was lined for 725. It had a reliable departure time from Hamilton making it a personal favourite for this newbie railfan. <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=47222#comment-49158</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2021 15:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/VIA-6926-HW-658-edited.jpg#comment-49158</guid>
		<description>Sharp eye, Aitch. The switch being open to the Cowpath means likely &quot;The Nanticoke&quot; was on the way or just thru; meaning this must be the afternoon VIA #84; as it is rather short.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharp eye, Aitch. The switch being open to the Cowpath means likely &#8220;The Nanticoke&#8221; was on the way or just thru; meaning this must be the afternoon VIA #84; as it is rather short.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aitch</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=47222#comment-49153</link>
		<dc:creator>Aitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2021 02:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/VIA-6926-HW-658-edited.jpg#comment-49153</guid>
		<description>Even without the sun, you can’t miss with a classic Hamilton West shot; old searchlights, dwarf signal and that extra tall eastbound signal on the south track. And the switch looks lined for a movement on or off the cowpath. Those LRC’s definitely were not the most attractive units. You might say, a face only a mother could love. Made them kinda likeable in a way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even without the sun, you can’t miss with a classic Hamilton West shot; old searchlights, dwarf signal and that extra tall eastbound signal on the south track. And the switch looks lined for a movement on or off the cowpath. Those LRC’s definitely were not the most attractive units. You might say, a face only a mother could love. Made them kinda likeable in a way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
