<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nice old station.  Not sure who gets the credit for this place&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;the Port Dover &amp; Lake Huron Railway was in its dying gasp, going broke, by the time it pushed this far back in 1877. Perhaps the Stratford &amp; Huron Rwy takes the credit. Anyway, they eventually became the Grand Trunk.  So the building was constructed, on land owned once by Listowel&#8217;s first settler,  around 1878-1880 and until 1970 served its purpose.  When &#8216;railiner&#8217; service ended; the building was repurposed as a recreation centre.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/nice-old-station-not-sure-who-gets-the-credit-for-this-place-the-port-dover-lake-huron-railway-was-in-its-dying-gasp-going-broke-by-the-time-it-pushed-this-far-back-in-1877-perhaps/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 20:26:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Steinman</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=47633#comment-62346</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Steinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 00:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/CN-Listowel-946-edited.jpg#comment-62346</guid>
		<description>Two years after my first comment, and this photo still mesmerizes me! Excellent photo. Big reminder of how much has changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two years after my first comment, and this photo still mesmerizes me! Excellent photo. Big reminder of how much has changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RTCDave</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=47633#comment-50724</link>
		<dc:creator>RTCDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 18:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/CN-Listowel-946-edited.jpg#comment-50724</guid>
		<description>Still there although does not look like a station. Still Kin Station. In-Laws live in Listowel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still there although does not look like a station. Still Kin Station. In-Laws live in Listowel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noe</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=47633#comment-49993</link>
		<dc:creator>Noe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/CN-Listowel-946-edited.jpg#comment-49993</guid>
		<description>Ah I see now. Sorry Arnold I never took the  Kincardine Subdivision into consideration for the dates. My bad. I was thinking just about the Newton Subdivision to Palmerston. Rusty Rails is a great book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah I see now. Sorry Arnold I never took the  Kincardine Subdivision into consideration for the dates. My bad. I was thinking just about the Newton Subdivision to Palmerston. Rusty Rails is a great book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Patterson</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=47633#comment-49985</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 17:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/CN-Listowel-946-edited.jpg#comment-49985</guid>
		<description>Arnold, those dates in your comment above are correct, but for the Kincardine Sub.  Listowel was mile 0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arnold, those dates in your comment above are correct, but for the Kincardine Sub.  Listowel was mile 0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=47633#comment-49983</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 17:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/CN-Listowel-946-edited.jpg#comment-49983</guid>
		<description>Interesting comment, Jason. Dates I mentioned in the second comment in this thread came from the book &quot;Rusty Rails&quot;. I did not realize the line was active this late. But then, what would be the odds of catching anything anyway. :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comment, Jason. Dates I mentioned in the second comment in this thread came from the book &#8220;Rusty Rails&#8221;. I did not realize the line was active this late. But then, what would be the odds of catching anything anyway. <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noe</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=47633#comment-49982</link>
		<dc:creator>Noe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/CN-Listowel-946-edited.jpg#comment-49982</guid>
		<description>Great photo Arnold. The open auto rack behind the station were common to be set-off there during that time (1970&#039;s) as local manufacturer Starcraft Recreational Products Limited loaded new camping trailers there for shipment to Winnipeg. 

The line was abandoned in 1995 and tracks were lifted in spring 1996.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great photo Arnold. The open auto rack behind the station were common to be set-off there during that time (1970&#8242;s) as local manufacturer Starcraft Recreational Products Limited loaded new camping trailers there for shipment to Winnipeg. </p>
<p>The line was abandoned in 1995 and tracks were lifted in spring 1996.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Patterson</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=47633#comment-49974</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 01:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/CN-Listowel-946-edited.jpg#comment-49974</guid>
		<description>Already done :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Already done <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=47633#comment-49973</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 01:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/CN-Listowel-946-edited.jpg#comment-49973</guid>
		<description>Jacob........please bother the Head Man for a Time Machine entry then. It would be nice to see what the station looks like now, as opposed to 45 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob&#8230;&#8230;..please bother the Head Man for a Time Machine entry then. It would be nice to see what the station looks like now, as opposed to 45 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Patterson</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=47633#comment-49972</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 01:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/CN-Listowel-946-edited.jpg#comment-49972</guid>
		<description>It is impressive how many small lines were created to compete with each other, plus the ones that existed as nothing more than expired charters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is impressive how many small lines were created to compete with each other, plus the ones that existed as nothing more than expired charters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Patterson</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=47633#comment-49971</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 01:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/CN-Listowel-946-edited.jpg#comment-49971</guid>
		<description>I shot almost the same angle last year.  It is still there and in good condition.  The Wellington, Grey and Bruce built from Palmerston to Listowel and on to Kincardine in 1871 with service starting to Listowel in December 1872 on this, their &quot;Kincardine Branch&quot;.  The station appears to be their construction.  The Stratford &amp; Huron (Port Dover &amp; Lake Huron) did indeed come into Listowel in 1877 from Stratford, joining the WG&amp;B just south of here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I shot almost the same angle last year.  It is still there and in good condition.  The Wellington, Grey and Bruce built from Palmerston to Listowel and on to Kincardine in 1871 with service starting to Listowel in December 1872 on this, their &#8220;Kincardine Branch&#8221;.  The station appears to be their construction.  The Stratford &amp; Huron (Port Dover &amp; Lake Huron) did indeed come into Listowel in 1877 from Stratford, joining the WG&amp;B just south of here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
