<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not in a great display location FP9Au CN 6311 sits on a back track at the Alberta Railway Museum.  The locomotive is privately owned and apparently registered as RPCX 6311.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/not-in-a-great-display-location-fp9au-cn-6311-sits-on-a-back-track-at-the-alberta-railway-museum-the-locomotive-is-privately-owned-and-apparently-registered-as-rpcx-6311/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 02:57:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Streit</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29717#comment-24248</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Streit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 17:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/IMG_4131A.jpg#comment-24248</guid>
		<description>According to the Branchline CTG, this unit was originally CN 6529, s/n A1201.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Branchline CTG, this unit was originally CN 6529, s/n A1201.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pierre fournier</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29717#comment-21755</link>
		<dc:creator>pierre fournier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/IMG_4131A.jpg#comment-21755</guid>
		<description>In its original green,6526 would more realistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In its original green,6526 would more realistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RLK2211</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29717#comment-21740</link>
		<dc:creator>RLK2211</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 03:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/IMG_4131A.jpg#comment-21740</guid>
		<description>Looks really good.

Is that unit still operational ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks really good.</p>
<p>Is that unit still operational ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
