<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not the sort of scene a Climate Buff would care to see, but this display of MLW smoke as a treat for us fans on the hillside overlooking The Junction.  VIA #75 is westbound, the time is 1810Hrs and it is a very warm and humid eve. THAT I remember. VIA 6761 leads, trailing 6871 smokes. Perhaps it still smokes, as the offending unit now toils for the Grand Canyon Railway as their 6871 !! I count 9 coaches on a rather short train in this image, another of a series I had taken 40 VIA years ago. August 23rd was a Wednesday&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/not-the-sort-of-scene-a-climate-buff-would-care-to-see-but-this-display-of-mlw-smoke-as-a-treat-for-us-fans-on-the-hillside-overlooking-the-junction-via-75-is-westbound-the-time-is-1810hrs-and-it/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 15:08:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRR5406</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=33686#comment-33522</link>
		<dc:creator>PRR5406</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/VIA-6761770-edited.jpg#comment-33522</guid>
		<description>One of the big advantages of Diesel locomotives over steam was the lack of dirty smoke left in their passage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the big advantages of Diesel locomotives over steam was the lack of dirty smoke left in their passage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=33686#comment-27063</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/VIA-6761770-edited.jpg#comment-27063</guid>
		<description>It was very late that day. I know not why, I just know that is the time I jotted down in my notebook. And usually I only made note of the time when it was abnormal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was very late that day. I know not why, I just know that is the time I jotted down in my notebook. And usually I only made note of the time when it was abnormal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cdntrainphotog</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=33686#comment-27056</link>
		<dc:creator>Cdntrainphotog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/VIA-6761770-edited.jpg#comment-27056</guid>
		<description>Train 75, in my 1996 Trackside Guide, was named the ERIE. If you shot it at 18:10 it was quite late that day. In 1996 it was due into London at 18:24. It wouldn&#039;t get from Bayview to London in 14 minutes. Was it late or have the schedules changed over the years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Train 75, in my 1996 Trackside Guide, was named the ERIE. If you shot it at 18:10 it was quite late that day. In 1996 it was due into London at 18:24. It wouldn&#8217;t get from Bayview to London in 14 minutes. Was it late or have the schedules changed over the years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
