<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: N&amp;W freight on the Cayuga subdivision east of St. Thomas. If anyone can help pinpoint the location, we&#8217;ll make the required correction. This one is a bit of a puzzler. Thank you to all who help &#8211; add to comments please and thank you.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/nw-freight-on-the-cayuga-subdivision-east-of-st-thomas-if-anyone-can-help-pinpoint-the-location-well-make-the-required-correction-this-one-is-a-bit-of-a-puzzler-thank-you-to-all-who-help/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 03:36:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry.oshell</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31267#comment-24224</link>
		<dc:creator>terry.oshell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 13:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NW8030July1979-edited.jpg#comment-24224</guid>
		<description>Stephen, in addition to Aaron&#039;s confirmation of the location, my research indicates N&amp;W 8030 is westbound and has just passed and is obscuring the former Great Western Railway station location at Cayuga (42.957355, -79.856570) and is easing into the left hand curve at Mile 49.00 that will take it under Hwy 54 and out across the Grand River. The trademark modern CN gas shack (grey with orange door) sits directly behind the Sectionmen toolhouse which was immediately east of the station building, the hydro feed to the toolhouse can be seen drooping across the right of way. I am not sure what the status of the station building was in 1979 however the Sectionman toolhouse survived until the line was abandoned. Thanks to a former colleague for providing track diagrams which helped me validate the siding and back track configuration. For a view of the station in the 70&#039;s visit https://www.railwaypages.com/haldimand-and-norfolk-counties For a view of this location looking east from the Hwy 54 overpass in 1996 before the rail was torn up and the toohouse and gas shack were removed visit http://www.niagararails.com/cayuga.phtml?mile=45#trackage</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen, in addition to Aaron&#8217;s confirmation of the location, my research indicates N&amp;W 8030 is westbound and has just passed and is obscuring the former Great Western Railway station location at Cayuga (42.957355, -79.856570) and is easing into the left hand curve at Mile 49.00 that will take it under Hwy 54 and out across the Grand River. The trademark modern CN gas shack (grey with orange door) sits directly behind the Sectionmen toolhouse which was immediately east of the station building, the hydro feed to the toolhouse can be seen drooping across the right of way. I am not sure what the status of the station building was in 1979 however the Sectionman toolhouse survived until the line was abandoned. Thanks to a former colleague for providing track diagrams which helped me validate the siding and back track configuration. For a view of the station in the 70&#8242;s visit <a href="https://www.railwaypages.com/haldimand-and-norfolk-counties" rel="nofollow">https://www.railwaypages.com/haldimand-and-norfolk-counties</a> For a view of this location looking east from the Hwy 54 overpass in 1996 before the rail was torn up and the toohouse and gas shack were removed visit <a href="http://www.niagararails.com/cayuga.phtml?mile=45#trackage" rel="nofollow">http://www.niagararails.com/cayuga.phtml?mile=45#trackage</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31267#comment-24215</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2017 01:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NW8030July1979-edited.jpg#comment-24215</guid>
		<description>Have some really good evidence from Aaron White that this is Cayuga so we&#039;ve updated to reflect. If so this is a westbound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have some really good evidence from Aaron White that this is Cayuga so we&#8217;ve updated to reflect. If so this is a westbound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snake</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31267#comment-24176</link>
		<dc:creator>snake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2017 21:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NW8030July1979-edited.jpg#comment-24176</guid>
		<description>I think you have a morning shot here....based on the sun  angle...late afternoon/evening in Jarvis the sun would be more head on...moving over from the south side of the tracks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have a morning shot here&#8230;.based on the sun  angle&#8230;late afternoon/evening in Jarvis the sun would be more head on&#8230;moving over from the south side of the tracks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31267#comment-24175</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2017 20:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NW8030July1979-edited.jpg#comment-24175</guid>
		<description>Apparently commissioned 1978... perhaps this is elsewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently commissioned 1978&#8230; perhaps this is elsewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31267#comment-24173</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2017 19:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NW8030July1979-edited.jpg#comment-24173</guid>
		<description>The one thing that throws it off is I can’t see the hydro lines in the distance, unless they weren’t installed yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one thing that throws it off is I can’t see the hydro lines in the distance, unless they weren’t installed yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31267#comment-24159</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2017 14:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NW8030July1979-edited.jpg#comment-24159</guid>
		<description>Great work Marcus. If this is correct, the track in foreground would have been part of the connecting track and yard used by freights until the Garnet bypass was built - which was around this time.

The bypass eliminated Garnet - Jarvis Cayuga sub moves and of course built the new yard which has since been expanded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work Marcus. If this is correct, the track in foreground would have been part of the connecting track and yard used by freights until the Garnet bypass was built &#8211; which was around this time.</p>
<p>The bypass eliminated Garnet &#8211; Jarvis Cayuga sub moves and of course built the new yard which has since been expanded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31267#comment-24151</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2017 03:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NW8030July1979-edited.jpg#comment-24151</guid>
		<description>Jarvis behind the old station, wasn’t sure if the track beyond was part of the old wye?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jarvis behind the old station, wasn’t sure if the track beyond was part of the old wye?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31267#comment-24141</link>
		<dc:creator>rsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2017 01:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NW8030July1979-edited.jpg#comment-24141</guid>
		<description>Canfield?  That looks like a CN shed next to the parallel CASO in the background!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canfield?  That looks like a CN shed next to the parallel CASO in the background!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
