<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On a recent visit to the principal Central Maine &amp; Quebec yard at Farnham, I thought I was going to get skunked. Nothing there but a few rail cars and a whole slew of &#8216;no trespassing&#8217; signs; especially around the former CP Office and Station which looked gutted. Hopefully restoration is in order. All of a sudden the signals activated. Phew!!!  And in backed a 5 unit freight. Now, THAT was better. So this was the catch, CMQ 9021, 9020, 3816, 3057 and LTEX 2540. The first two units x-CP &#8220;barns&#8221; and the last unit still in BNSF colours. The 3057 I remember seeing numerous times as FURX. The 3816? No idea on it. Anyone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/on-a-recent-visit-to-the-principal-central-maine-quebec-yard-at-farnham-i-thought-i-was-going-to-get-skunked-nothing-there-but-a-few-rail-cars-and-a-whole-slew-of-no-trespassing-signs-esp/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:54:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29892#comment-22090</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2017 02:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/DSC_0188-edited.jpg#comment-22090</guid>
		<description>What a sweet consist!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a sweet consist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29892#comment-22087</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2017 01:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/DSC_0188-edited.jpg#comment-22087</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Mike. Old guys don&#039;t google as well as they used to.&gt;BG&lt; The station, according to what came up on the screen, is Heritage. So yes, thats what it looked like.....a reconditioning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mike. Old guys don&#8217;t google as well as they used to.&gt;BG&lt; The station, according to what came up on the screen, is Heritage. So yes, thats what it looked like&#8230;..a reconditioning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lockwood</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29892#comment-22086</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lockwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2017 01:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/DSC_0188-edited.jpg#comment-22086</guid>
		<description>No problem, Arnold... Google ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem, Arnold&#8230; Google <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mberry</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29892#comment-22085</link>
		<dc:creator>mberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2017 01:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/DSC_0188-edited.jpg#comment-22085</guid>
		<description>Interesting, there was no fence around it when I was last in Farnham in April.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/144869330@N05/33554606792/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, there was no fence around it when I was last in Farnham in April.<br />
<a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/144869330@N05/33554606792/" rel="nofollow">https://www.flickr.com/photos/144869330@N05/33554606792/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29892#comment-22084</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2017 01:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/DSC_0188-edited.jpg#comment-22084</guid>
		<description>Well, Mr. Berry, it sure looks like it would be coming down; as it has been gutted and just the shell remains; windows and all that removed; and fence around it. I was told it was going to be saved.......but kinda wonder. A true demolition would have made me think they would just move in with the heavy equipment and begin tearing it down. But no. It hasn&#039;t started that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Mr. Berry, it sure looks like it would be coming down; as it has been gutted and just the shell remains; windows and all that removed; and fence around it. I was told it was going to be saved&#8230;&#8230;.but kinda wonder. A true demolition would have made me think they would just move in with the heavy equipment and begin tearing it down. But no. It hasn&#8217;t started that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mberry</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29892#comment-22082</link>
		<dc:creator>mberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 23:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/DSC_0188-edited.jpg#comment-22082</guid>
		<description>Quite the opposite concerning the station, demolition may be its future. MMA had used it as an office but CMQ has not and the city does not want it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite the opposite concerning the station, demolition may be its future. MMA had used it as an office but CMQ has not and the city does not want it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29892#comment-22076</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 19:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/DSC_0188-edited.jpg#comment-22076</guid>
		<description>That was quick. Thanks, Mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was quick. Thanks, Mike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lockwood</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=29892#comment-22075</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lockwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2017 19:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/DSC_0188-edited.jpg#comment-22075</guid>
		<description>CMQ 3816 is a former ATSF GP35, rebuilt to GP38-3 specs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CMQ 3816 is a former ATSF GP35, rebuilt to GP38-3 specs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
