<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the 80th anniversary of D-Day, the first locomotive ever to lead in Ontario with the new CPKC Livery number KCS 4805 the second unit to have been repainted with such paint scheme, leads a CPKC 113 as they head through SSS Palgrave on their way Northwards up the Mactier Sub after spending a while at VIT due to DPU issues. Note the KCS sublettering due to the CPKC roadname not being approved yet.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/on-the-80th-anniversary-of-d-day-the-first-locomotive-ever-to-lead-in-ontario-with-the-new-cpkc-livery-number-kcs-4805-the-second-unit-to-have-been-repainted-with-such-paint-scheme-leads-a-cpkc-113/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:44:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ngineered4u</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=54564#comment-61230</link>
		<dc:creator>ngineered4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 22:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/CPKC-113-10-Edited.jpg#comment-61230</guid>
		<description>Is the sublettering because they are waiting for approval or to distinguish the unit as KCS 4805 vs CP 4805. I know at CN  we had to use the sublettering to identify ourselves, especially to the RTC or Rule 42 foreman. For instance there is a IC 9626 (GP38-2) and a CN 9626 (GP40-2LW ). Even though both are CN units, the crew operating IC 9626 would have to call themselves IC 9626 and not CN 9626</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the sublettering because they are waiting for approval or to distinguish the unit as KCS 4805 vs CP 4805. I know at CN  we had to use the sublettering to identify ourselves, especially to the RTC or Rule 42 foreman. For instance there is a IC 9626 (GP38-2) and a CN 9626 (GP40-2LW ). Even though both are CN units, the crew operating IC 9626 would have to call themselves IC 9626 and not CN 9626</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
