<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only 61 years young when this photo was taken, ex TH&amp;B #72 was chop nosed, re-numbered 1682 and received an upgraded engine block like CP&#8217;s GP9u&#8217;s making 1750hp versus the 1500 it previously had. It is shown in the track 5 east spot of the just completed rebuilt Diesel Shop. Notice how sparkling clean the concrete still is.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/only-61-years-young-when-this-photo-was-taken-ex-thb-72-was-chop-nosed-re-numbered-1682-and-received-an-upgraded-engine-block-like-cps-gp9us-making-1750hp-versus-the-1500-it-previously-had/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 20:24:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Driver8666</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28601#comment-20249</link>
		<dc:creator>Driver8666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/1682-newshopNov172011.jpg#comment-20249</guid>
		<description>One or the other. Let&#039;s hope it&#039;s the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One or the other. Let&#8217;s hope it&#8217;s the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PacificPaul</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28601#comment-20241</link>
		<dc:creator>PacificPaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 02:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/1682-newshopNov172011.jpg#comment-20241</guid>
		<description>Could it be that it was the 1684 that was earmarked for preservation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be that it was the 1684 that was earmarked for preservation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Driver8666</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28601#comment-20218</link>
		<dc:creator>Driver8666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 05:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/1682-newshopNov172011.jpg#comment-20218</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t this going to be preserved? That&#039;s the consensus, but with good ole E who was in charge I guess he didn&#039;t know. Lots of things good ole E apparently didn&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t this going to be preserved? That&#8217;s the consensus, but with good ole E who was in charge I guess he didn&#8217;t know. Lots of things good ole E apparently didn&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PacificPaul</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28601#comment-20206</link>
		<dc:creator>PacificPaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2017 19:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/1682-newshopNov172011.jpg#comment-20206</guid>
		<description>Sad to say it was sent to SRY in BC for parts salvage and scrapping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad to say it was sent to SRY in BC for parts salvage and scrapping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Driver8666</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28601#comment-20194</link>
		<dc:creator>Driver8666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2017 08:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/1682-newshopNov172011.jpg#comment-20194</guid>
		<description>Was this rebuilt into one of those GP20C-ECO&#039;s or did it escape and is waiting for the TRHS to come claim it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was this rebuilt into one of those GP20C-ECO&#8217;s or did it escape and is waiting for the TRHS to come claim it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PacificPaul</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28601#comment-20190</link>
		<dc:creator>PacificPaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2017 02:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/1682-newshopNov172011.jpg#comment-20190</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your kind comments &quot;Extra 1014&quot; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your kind comments &#8220;Extra 1014&#8243; <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extra 1014</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28601#comment-20188</link>
		<dc:creator>Extra 1014</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2017 02:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/1682-newshopNov172011.jpg#comment-20188</guid>
		<description>Just like the NAR units that ran through Redwater AB, it is a little odd when you see a chopped CP GP with no dynamic brakes. Your shop shots are pretty terrific Paul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like the NAR units that ran through Redwater AB, it is a little odd when you see a chopped CP GP with no dynamic brakes. Your shop shots are pretty terrific Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
