<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our only true catch of the day was a good one in my books, CN SD60F 5500 leading a short manifest under Denfield Bridge. It&#8217;s getting difficult to shoot there now with all of the overgrowth but it was on the way home and quiet so we scooted up the old dirt road to see if anything was coming, shortly after rain was on the way so we were back on the road.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/our-only-true-catch-of-the-day-was-a-good-one-in-my-books-cn-sd60f-5500-leading-a-short-manifest-under-denfield-bridge-its-getting-difficult-to-shoot-there-now-with-all-of-the-overgrowth-but-it-wa/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 18:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HunterBHolmes</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=11033#comment-3115</link>
		<dc:creator>HunterBHolmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/CN-330-August-26-2013.jpg#comment-3115</guid>
		<description>Technically 5500 was reclassed to an SD60F as with the rest of it&#039;s small class. Thanks for the input though and I prefer the classification that you&#039;ve suggested as it hints at this units heritage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically 5500 was reclassed to an SD60F as with the rest of it&#8217;s small class. Thanks for the input though and I prefer the classification that you&#8217;ve suggested as it hints at this units heritage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CitySlicker</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=11033#comment-3114</link>
		<dc:creator>CitySlicker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 22:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/CN-330-August-26-2013.jpg#comment-3114</guid>
		<description>5500 is a SD50AF, nice try though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5500 is a SD50AF, nice try though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
