<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Over the International Bridge at Fort Erie comes Chessie (B&amp;O) 4424 and 4277 with a transfer while Maine Central 593 and 591 are heading Stateside.
Fort Erie&#8217;s CN used to be quite busy daily with transfer runs coming over from the USA.
Chessie, Conrail and NS&#8230;.I&#8217;m guessing MEC power was available on this particular day. Anyone have proper information?
Photo taken from Central Av Bridge.
&#8220;Black Rock&#8221;, over in Buffalo, can be seen over the river.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/over-the-international-bridge-at-fort-erie-comes-chessie-bo-4424-and-4277-with-a-transfer-while-maine-central-593-and-591-are-heading-stateside-fort-eries-cn-used-to-be-quite-busy-daily-wit/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 18:00:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercer</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=7296#comment-4831</link>
		<dc:creator>mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/MEC-meets-Chessie-take-2.jpg#comment-4831</guid>
		<description>Yes, the D&amp;H/ Guilford era, right before CSX took paper control of NYSW. The 2 Chessie gp40&#039;s are on a transfer on behalf of ? CR and these were C&amp;O St Thomas crews, either laying over from 42/41, or deadheaded specifically for this transfer. It was CN traffic to/from CR and also to/from the B&amp;O portion of Chessie at that time. They would originate at B&amp;O Buffalo Creek yard, make the turn and go back. Then either get rest and take 41 &#039;home&#039;, or go home in a taxi. Sounds familiar ?  Yep, its how the NS operates today because CN doesn&#039;t want to do it. Bruce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the D&amp;H/ Guilford era, right before CSX took paper control of NYSW. The 2 Chessie gp40&#8242;s are on a transfer on behalf of ? CR and these were C&amp;O St Thomas crews, either laying over from 42/41, or deadheaded specifically for this transfer. It was CN traffic to/from CR and also to/from the B&amp;O portion of Chessie at that time. They would originate at B&amp;O Buffalo Creek yard, make the turn and go back. Then either get rest and take 41 &#8216;home&#8217;, or go home in a taxi. Sounds familiar ?  Yep, its how the NS operates today because CN doesn&#8217;t want to do it. Bruce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=7296#comment-2247</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 12:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/MEC-meets-Chessie-take-2.jpg#comment-2247</guid>
		<description>Awesome shot, hard to believe the power that once ran here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome shot, hard to believe the power that once ran here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=7296#comment-1409</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/MEC-meets-Chessie-take-2.jpg#comment-1409</guid>
		<description>Correct, Rob. From SK Yard it is. Thankfully with whatever power was laying around. Figuring who did what and why with what has been getting my noggin scrambled. Old, ya know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct, Rob. From SK Yard it is. Thankfully with whatever power was laying around. Figuring who did what and why with what has been getting my noggin scrambled. Old, ya know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=7296#comment-1408</link>
		<dc:creator>rsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/MEC-meets-Chessie-take-2.jpg#comment-1408</guid>
		<description>Another Mooney Classic. Awesome. The MEC units would be on a transfer to/from D&amp;H SK Yard wouldn&#039;t they? I assume this was during the &quot;Guilford&quot; era on the D&amp;H?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Mooney Classic. Awesome. The MEC units would be on a transfer to/from D&amp;H SK Yard wouldn&#8217;t they? I assume this was during the &#8220;Guilford&#8221; era on the D&amp;H?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: headtailgrep</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=7296#comment-1405</link>
		<dc:creator>headtailgrep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 01:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/MEC-meets-Chessie-take-2.jpg#comment-1405</guid>
		<description>I suppose the identifying factor in the Chessie train being a transfer is it is leading into the CN section of track - otherwise it would be taking the Fort Erie sub to head to St. Thomas. Would that MEC be a Conrail transfer then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose the identifying factor in the Chessie train being a transfer is it is leading into the CN section of track &#8211; otherwise it would be taking the Fort Erie sub to head to St. Thomas. Would that MEC be a Conrail transfer then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
