<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Probably 75 for Windsor heading out on a beautiful spring morning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/probably-75-for-windsor-heading-out-on-a-beautiful-spring-morning/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 18:00:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Brook</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=20387#comment-10469</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Brook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/via6785sdf.jpg#comment-10469</guid>
		<description>Eric, you might be right. I was trying to pull the date off a very beaten up slide; the second 8 might well be a 3. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, you might be right. I was trying to pull the date off a very beaten up slide; the second 8 might well be a 3. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric May</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=20387#comment-10458</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 22:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/via6785sdf.jpg#comment-10458</guid>
		<description>I think the date might be earlier. There are no tracks in the fly-under and the skydome would have been partially built in 1988. 1983 perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the date might be earlier. There are no tracks in the fly-under and the skydome would have been partially built in 1988. 1983 perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Brook</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=20387#comment-10452</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Brook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/via6785sdf.jpg#comment-10452</guid>
		<description>Probably just before noon. 71 had Tempo stuff in those days; let&#039;s settle on 73 :). Coach yard was busy; a fun if leisurely place to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably just before noon. 71 had Tempo stuff in those days; let&#8217;s settle on 73 <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Coach yard was busy; a fun if leisurely place to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=20387#comment-10448</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/via6785sdf.jpg#comment-10448</guid>
		<description>Too short for #75, wouldn&#039;t you say? Perhaps it is #71. But what the heck, it is a great shot; especially with the Northlander lurking in the background.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too short for #75, wouldn&#8217;t you say? Perhaps it is #71. But what the heck, it is a great shot; especially with the Northlander lurking in the background.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
