<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quite some time ago I posted a photo of this caboose taken in the evening and showing the west side. For completeness and the fact there is a crest on the opposite side. Here is the east side taken in the morning sun. I drove by hear the other day and the caboose is still standing sentinel over the Strathcona industrial district. It certainly has my vote to keep it standing.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/quite-some-time-ago-i-posted-a-photo-of-this-caboose-taken-in-the-evening-and-showing-the-west-side-for-completeness-and-the-fact-there-is-a-crest-on-the-opposite-side-here-is-the-east-side-taken-in/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 19:27:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brundle</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49069#comment-52410</link>
		<dc:creator>Brundle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 14:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/CN-79617-1.jpg#comment-52410</guid>
		<description>Thunder Bay was a named mentioned in that regard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thunder Bay was a named mentioned in that regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bcr_766</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49069#comment-52393</link>
		<dc:creator>bcr_766</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/CN-79617-1.jpg#comment-52393</guid>
		<description>That bridge is originally an ore load out from down east.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That bridge is originally an ore load out from down east.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brundle</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49069#comment-52378</link>
		<dc:creator>Brundle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2022 13:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/CN-79617-1.jpg#comment-52378</guid>
		<description>Here is a link to my first post. http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38566
It gives a good idea of the height. 3 cabooses could be stacked one on top of another and it looks like that will not be enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a link to my first post. <a href="http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38566" rel="nofollow">http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38566</a><br />
It gives a good idea of the height. 3 cabooses could be stacked one on top of another and it looks like that will not be enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pierre fournier</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49069#comment-52377</link>
		<dc:creator>pierre fournier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2022 11:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/CN-79617-1.jpg#comment-52377</guid>
		<description>How high is that bridge ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How high is that bridge ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Patterson</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49069#comment-52370</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2022 17:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/CN-79617-1.jpg#comment-52370</guid>
		<description>Same thing happened to caboose 79217 here in Guelph, sitting on work equipment trucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same thing happened to caboose 79217 here in Guelph, sitting on work equipment trucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brundle</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49069#comment-52368</link>
		<dc:creator>Brundle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2022 17:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/CN-79617-1.jpg#comment-52368</guid>
		<description>It seems CN puts value on caboose trucks, as those are not the original equipment. The originals have been replaced with trucks that, from a quick search, are quite often found under old work train cars and the like. If CN kept the original roller bearing trucks (from their many cabeese :-)), what is riding around on top of them now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems CN puts value on caboose trucks, as those are not the original equipment. The originals have been replaced with trucks that, from a quick search, are quite often found under old work train cars and the like. If CN kept the original roller bearing trucks (from their many cabeese <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ), what is riding around on top of them now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
