Comments on: Rob Smith’s recent post of CN “CS-02″ reminded me of this encounter with the same unit only a couple hundred feet from his shot. CN 1379 was renumbered to CS-02 then back to 1379 again. I believe it acquired the extra posts and chains while on lease to an industry after being renumbered the second time. http://www.railpictures.ca The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh? Tue, 26 May 2026 05:18:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: mattwatson http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39725#comment-36375 mattwatson Sun, 15 Dec 2019 20:20:51 +0000 http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/13-0329.jpg#comment-36375 Ah! thats interesting, thanks Bruce. Ah! thats interesting, thanks Bruce.

]]> By: mercer http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39725#comment-36374 mercer Sun, 15 Dec 2019 20:08:28 +0000 http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/13-0329.jpg#comment-36374 I don’t want to sound like Wheel Of Fortune, but….there were two CS-02. The first one was, like you correctly surmised, the 1272. It was renumbered on or after Oct1995. Then renumbered back upon resale to Canac. The second was 1379, renumbered on or after Apr1999. CS-02/1379 was leased to Eurocan, Kitimat BC, which must be where it got that " fall protection ". I don’t want to sound like Wheel Of Fortune, but….there were two CS-02.
The first one was, like you correctly surmised, the 1272. It was renumbered on or after Oct1995. Then renumbered back upon resale to Canac.
The second was 1379, renumbered on or after Apr1999.
CS-02/1379 was leased to Eurocan, Kitimat BC, which must be where it got that ” fall protection “.

]]> By: rsmith http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=39725#comment-36361 rsmith Sun, 15 Dec 2019 14:18:14 +0000 http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/13-0329.jpg#comment-36361 Don't know where I got 1272 from... that confirms it! Thanks Matt. Don’t know where I got 1272 from… that confirms it! Thanks Matt.

]]>