<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Say it isn&#8217;t so!! Unfortunately red barn 9001 is undergoing it&#8217;s safe to travel inspection with the 5878 as it has also been sold.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/say-it-isnt-so-unfortunately-red-barn-9001-is-undergoing-its-safe-to-travel-inspection-with-the-5878-as-it-has-also-been-sold/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 17:07:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNSD60F</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=27784#comment-18945</link>
		<dc:creator>CNSD60F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 03:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/2-SOLD-SD.jpg#comment-18945</guid>
		<description>OH COME ON! I (and probably everyone else on this site) would much rather see it in attractive CMQ Blue and silver than see it cut up in pieces</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH COME ON! I (and probably everyone else on this site) would much rather see it in attractive CMQ Blue and silver than see it cut up in pieces</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=27784#comment-18941</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 01:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/2-SOLD-SD.jpg#comment-18941</guid>
		<description>Matthew is an acetylene torch considered a Railway?

Word is sold for scrap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew is an acetylene torch considered a Railway?</p>
<p>Word is sold for scrap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNSD60F</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=27784#comment-18940</link>
		<dc:creator>CNSD60F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 00:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/2-SOLD-SD.jpg#comment-18940</guid>
		<description>if only the macs would be in service...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if only the macs would be in service&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Whiteley</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=27784#comment-18933</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Whiteley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/2-SOLD-SD.jpg#comment-18933</guid>
		<description>What Railway were 5878 and 9001 sold to?

Nice Photo Paul!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Railway were 5878 and 9001 sold to?</p>
<p>Nice Photo Paul!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
