<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Six axle MLW C630-M 2005 built 1967 with MLW C-424 3233 are headed toward Hamilton with a load of ore destined for Dofasco. These standard hopper cars would be replaced later with cylindrical hopper cars which had two wheels on top which looked like they came off a wheelbarrow. The wheels were used to open the top doors for loading iron ore pellets which originated at the Sherman Mine in Temagami.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/six-axle-mlw-c630-m-2005-built-1967-with-mlw-c-424-3233-are-headed-toward-hamilton-with-a-load-of-ore-destined-for-dofasco-these-standard-hopper-cars-would-be-replaced-later-with-cylindrical-hopper-c/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 16:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Brook</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35017#comment-60056</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Brook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 01:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CN2005_1024-0168.jpg#comment-60056</guid>
		<description>IIRC, the U868, U869 numbers were the late 70&#039;s(from peaking through the Condcutors timetable on the Northlnader). It was 730, 731 when I was hired on in 1981.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IIRC, the U868, U869 numbers were the late 70&#8242;s(from peaking through the Condcutors timetable on the Northlnader). It was 730, 731 when I was hired on in 1981.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Burroughs</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35017#comment-47338</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Burroughs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 11:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CN2005_1024-0168.jpg#comment-47338</guid>
		<description>Bruce, entirely possible but if you read the comments posted by Bruce Mercer, he thinks it was Jan 21. I am more inclined to say that his notes are more accurate than mine. It was not until 1970 that I started logging rather than tagging the slides when I got them back from processing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, entirely possible but if you read the comments posted by Bruce Mercer, he thinks it was Jan 21. I am more inclined to say that his notes are more accurate than mine. It was not until 1970 that I started logging rather than tagging the slides when I got them back from processing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35017#comment-47336</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2021 04:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CN2005_1024-0168.jpg#comment-47336</guid>
		<description>Would this be taken on the New Year’s Day when everybody got together at Bayview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would this be taken on the New Year’s Day when everybody got together at Bayview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ngineered4u</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35017#comment-29119</link>
		<dc:creator>ngineered4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 16:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CN2005_1024-0168.jpg#comment-29119</guid>
		<description>Ore trains 730/731 did indeed go to the &quot;bayfront&quot; at Dafasco and yes at that point they did have a mix of CN and ONR short cylindrical hoppers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ore trains 730/731 did indeed go to the &#8220;bayfront&#8221; at Dafasco and yes at that point they did have a mix of CN and ONR short cylindrical hoppers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Burroughs</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35017#comment-29114</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Burroughs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 14:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CN2005_1024-0168.jpg#comment-29114</guid>
		<description>Bruce, you could be right, late January.  I wonder where I got the idea that these trains were headed for Dofasco. Maybe after the cylindrical hoppers came into service. I have pictures of the ore train down the N&amp;NW at Dofasco.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, you could be right, late January.  I wonder where I got the idea that these trains were headed for Dofasco. Maybe after the cylindrical hoppers came into service. I have pictures of the ore train down the N&amp;NW at Dofasco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercer</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35017#comment-29110</link>
		<dc:creator>mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 14:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CN2005_1024-0168.jpg#comment-29110</guid>
		<description>The so-called &#039;Dane&#039; ore trains ( from the Adams Mine on the ONR) were operated in a joint effort by ONR-CN-NYC-P&amp;LE, to the Jones &amp; Laughlin steel mill at Aliquipa PA. These began in mid1963 and continued into the early 80s. The train numbers were 448 from North Bay to Toronto; 449 Toronto to Ft Erie; 450 for empties from Ft Erie to Toronto; and 451 for the empties back to North Bay. Yes, I realize there was a Newmarket Sub merchandise freight numbered 451 at one point around 1970. At that time, the &#039;Dane&#039; ore became simply 449 for the loads and 450 for empties.
Dave - I calculate the date of this photo as approximately Jan 21. In my notebook for Jan1968, I didn&#039;t see this train, however, on Jan 19 I did see train 308 (Sarnia-Toronto) with these engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The so-called &#8216;Dane&#8217; ore trains ( from the Adams Mine on the ONR) were operated in a joint effort by ONR-CN-NYC-P&amp;LE, to the Jones &amp; Laughlin steel mill at Aliquipa PA. These began in mid1963 and continued into the early 80s. The train numbers were 448 from North Bay to Toronto; 449 Toronto to Ft Erie; 450 for empties from Ft Erie to Toronto; and 451 for the empties back to North Bay. Yes, I realize there was a Newmarket Sub merchandise freight numbered 451 at one point around 1970. At that time, the &#8216;Dane&#8217; ore became simply 449 for the loads and 450 for empties.<br />
Dave &#8211; I calculate the date of this photo as approximately Jan 21. In my notebook for Jan1968, I didn&#8217;t see this train, however, on Jan 19 I did see train 308 (Sarnia-Toronto) with these engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Burroughs</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35017#comment-29104</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Burroughs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 02:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CN2005_1024-0168.jpg#comment-29104</guid>
		<description>Nah! Arnold has many times the number of pics posted here than I have.  Just trying to filter out some of the better compositions or subject matter and share them.  Just wish I had used Kodachrome in the early days of my slide taking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah! Arnold has many times the number of pics posted here than I have.  Just trying to filter out some of the better compositions or subject matter and share them.  Just wish I had used Kodachrome in the early days of my slide taking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Burroughs</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35017#comment-29101</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Burroughs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 02:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CN2005_1024-0168.jpg#comment-29101</guid>
		<description>Bruce, I have the slide marked as 449.  Thought it was 449/450.  Rob, no show box, just dug into some of the slide trays. I seem to go in fits and starts.  More coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, I have the slide marked as 449.  Thought it was 449/450.  Rob, no show box, just dug into some of the slide trays. I seem to go in fits and starts.  More coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ngineered4u</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35017#comment-29090</link>
		<dc:creator>ngineered4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 21:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CN2005_1024-0168.jpg#comment-29090</guid>
		<description>@snake..it seems they changed the numbers frequently. When i ran them to Hamilton from Jane St they were 730/731</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@snake..it seems they changed the numbers frequently. When i ran them to Hamilton from Jane St they were 730/731</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snake2</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35017#comment-29089</link>
		<dc:creator>Snake2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 21:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CN2005_1024-0168.jpg#comment-29089</guid>
		<description>U868 / U869 was the ore train at some point</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U868 / U869 was the ore train at some point</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
