<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So I am out there hoping for a decent shot of the Steel Train out of Hamilton, or perhaps the afternoon Laser train. It happens I get both, on the move, almost right in front of me. Some days are like that. At least one didn&#8217;t cancel out the other, which can be maddening. I&#8217;m on the hillside on the NW side of the 403; and here, running east, is the Laser, with GT 6414 and 6417 whilst in the foreground is the Steel train destined for Nanticoke, with CN 4572, 9196 and 4533.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/so-i-am-out-there-hoping-for-a-decent-shot-of-the-steel-train-out-of-hamilton-or-perhaps-the-afternoon-laser-train-it-happens-i-get-both-on-the-move-almost-right-in-front-of-me-some-days-are-like/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 21:35:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Brook</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35343#comment-29731</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Brook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 23:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Laser-Steel-meet033-edited.jpg#comment-29731</guid>
		<description>239-238 were the Chicago- Toronto Laser&#039;s. 233-234, 235 -236 were the Toronto - Montreal versions. Crews joked that they were great to work as you never got a Clear to Stop signal, but had to &quot;Laz&quot; around for hours to get them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>239-238 were the Chicago- Toronto Laser&#8217;s. 233-234, 235 -236 were the Toronto &#8211; Montreal versions. Crews joked that they were great to work as you never got a Clear to Stop signal, but had to &#8220;Laz&#8221; around for hours to get them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35343#comment-29726</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 14:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Laser-Steel-meet033-edited.jpg#comment-29726</guid>
		<description>Brad: Mike Lockwood described the &quot;Laser&quot; back in commentary of photo #12629 about 5 years ago stating the &quot;Laser was a Chicago-Montreal trailer train that utilized &#039;well cars&#039; for moving (truck) trailers thru the St. Clair Tunnel&quot;.  This being before the tunnel was enlarged and the service redundant.
The GP9 upset a lot of us, as the classic A-B-A combo had brought us out in groves.

Stuart: I&#039;m not sure on the steel train routing; it began thru Hambone and shared with CP (TH&amp;B) over 9 week or three month intervals, something like that. I think they only used the Hambone downtown route in the spring of 1986 and after that went by way of Dundas Sub.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad: Mike Lockwood described the &#8220;Laser&#8221; back in commentary of photo #12629 about 5 years ago stating the &#8220;Laser was a Chicago-Montreal trailer train that utilized &#8216;well cars&#8217; for moving (truck) trailers thru the St. Clair Tunnel&#8221;.  This being before the tunnel was enlarged and the service redundant.<br />
The GP9 upset a lot of us, as the classic A-B-A combo had brought us out in groves.</p>
<p>Stuart: I&#8217;m not sure on the steel train routing; it began thru Hambone and shared with CP (TH&amp;B) over 9 week or three month intervals, something like that. I think they only used the Hambone downtown route in the spring of 1986 and after that went by way of Dundas Sub.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradKetchen</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35343#comment-29725</link>
		<dc:creator>BradKetchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 12:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Laser-Steel-meet033-edited.jpg#comment-29725</guid>
		<description>Very nice again Mr Mooney! Sorry..but what was a &#039;Laser&#039; train? Love the double GT units and the use of a GP9m on what I understand was normally F9&#039;s and a B-unit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice again Mr Mooney! Sorry..but what was a &#8216;Laser&#8217; train? Love the double GT units and the use of a GP9m on what I understand was normally F9&#8242;s and a B-unit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Flood</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35343#comment-29721</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Flood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 03:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Laser-Steel-meet033-edited.jpg#comment-29721</guid>
		<description>So these were the trains of the time I was an infant! Nice Arnold...another classic shot. I definitely remember those Laser trains...the one you captured here was quite similar to what I recall seeing in Kitchener on the Guelph Sub.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So these were the trains of the time I was an infant! Nice Arnold&#8230;another classic shot. I definitely remember those Laser trains&#8230;the one you captured here was quite similar to what I recall seeing in Kitchener on the Guelph Sub.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Streit</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35343#comment-29712</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Streit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 16:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Laser-Steel-meet033-edited.jpg#comment-29712</guid>
		<description>As they say, sometimes it&#039;s better to be lucky, than be good! When did the steel train run from the lower city to Nanticoke switch from the former H&amp;NW routing via Ferguson Avenue to the path via Brantford?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As they say, sometimes it&#8217;s better to be lucky, than be good! When did the steel train run from the lower city to Nanticoke switch from the former H&amp;NW routing via Ferguson Avenue to the path via Brantford?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
