<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some elephant-style second generation EMD/GMD action puts in an appearance on a gloomy day in Galt: CP Rail GP35 units 5021 and 5020 (in 5&#8243; striped and 8&#8243; striped large multimark paint schemes, respectively) splice borrowed Chesapeake &amp; Ohio GP30 3004 on a westbound freight, rolling by the yard at Galt on the Galt Sub. White extra flags and nose class-lights lit up suggest this freight is likely running as &#8220;CP Extra 5021 West&#8221;.

Bill McArthur photo, Dan Dell&#8217;Unto collection slide.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/some-elephant-style-second-generation-emdgmd-action-puts-in-an-appearance-on-a-gloomy-day-in-galt-cp-rail-gp35-units-5021-and-5020-in-5-striped-and-8-striped-large-multimark-paint-schemes-resp/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 23:39:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakob Mueller</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=54152#comment-60626</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob Mueller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2024 20:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/CP-5021-CO-3004-CP-5020-wbnd-Galt-ON-06-30-1979-Bill-McArthur-docu0018-vAexs-copyr.jpg#comment-60626</guid>
		<description>I actually really like that way of categorizing these - based on technological change, rather than cosmetic change. At least in retrospect, there is something different about seeing GP30s and 35s versus later models. Today, it is interesting to see &quot;former&quot; 30s and 35s in their rebuilt incarnations, like a BNSF &quot;GP30M&quot; or the ex-ATSF &quot;GP38-3&quot; units CP got from CMQ.

Also - a GP9 and a GP35 have the same frame length. They only started getting longer with the 38/40 series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually really like that way of categorizing these &#8211; based on technological change, rather than cosmetic change. At least in retrospect, there is something different about seeing GP30s and 35s versus later models. Today, it is interesting to see &#8220;former&#8221; 30s and 35s in their rebuilt incarnations, like a BNSF &#8220;GP30M&#8221; or the ex-ATSF &#8220;GP38-3&#8243; units CP got from CMQ.</p>
<p>Also &#8211; a GP9 and a GP35 have the same frame length. They only started getting longer with the 38/40 series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extra 5610 West</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=54152#comment-60613</link>
		<dc:creator>Extra 5610 West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2024 15:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/CP-5021-CO-3004-CP-5020-wbnd-Galt-ON-06-30-1979-Bill-McArthur-docu0018-vAexs-copyr.jpg#comment-60613</guid>
		<description>For myself, and likely myself alone, I would call these units the culmination of first generation power (the turbocharging of the 567 engine - brought about by the UP Omaha GP20&#039;s). To me, the second generation started with the advent of the 645 engine and the room it provided for turbocharging and the corresponding leaps in Hp (and reliable modular electronics). A similar ending came to the 645 with the 50 line of units, as with the above GP30 and GP35. Reliability became a problem as they tried to squeak out all the Hp in the cu. in. available. Thus the 710 brought about the third generation.
Okay, the flogging can now commence. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For myself, and likely myself alone, I would call these units the culmination of first generation power (the turbocharging of the 567 engine &#8211; brought about by the UP Omaha GP20&#8242;s). To me, the second generation started with the advent of the 645 engine and the room it provided for turbocharging and the corresponding leaps in Hp (and reliable modular electronics). A similar ending came to the 645 with the 50 line of units, as with the above GP30 and GP35. Reliability became a problem as they tried to squeak out all the Hp in the cu. in. available. Thus the 710 brought about the third generation.<br />
Okay, the flogging can now commence. <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
