<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starting several months previous to this photo date, the unit trains of sulphur empties would, on occasion, bring a bunch of grain hoppers on the headend (biggie sized in this instance). Dropped off where??? I don&#8217;t know, Lac La Biche maybe? This was a long train with the grain cars, the caboose has yet to appear away down there in the brown of hoppers and trees. The shadows are already very long for 14:00 in the afternoon, amazing weather for December, no snow. Caboose 79605 at the rear.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/starting-several-months-previous-to-this-photo-date-the-unit-trains-of-sulphur-empties-would-on-occasion-bring-a-bunch-of-grain-hoppers-on-the-headend-biggie-sized-in-this-instance-dropped-off-w/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 22:00:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brundle</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=52795#comment-58529</link>
		<dc:creator>Brundle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 17:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/CN-4232.jpg#comment-58529</guid>
		<description>As-Built, it looks like no other GP, of any variety, came with these trucks. (The US army had GP&#039;s delivered with type A switcher trucks, the ones found under almost every switcher, that would make for a long day at work for the engine-man, rough riding) The CN&#039;s 1900&#039;s came with them and at this same time when CN was having theirs delivered, the Chicago &amp; Illinois Midland took delivery of 2 RS1325&#039;s. These look just like a 1900, the difference being a sloped down short hood and smaller number boards. The New Haven had flexicoil 4 wheel trucks on the front of their FL9&#039;s, but, the wheelbase on these was a foot longer. Info gleaned from The Second Diesel Spotter&#039;s Guide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As-Built, it looks like no other GP, of any variety, came with these trucks. (The US army had GP&#8217;s delivered with type A switcher trucks, the ones found under almost every switcher, that would make for a long day at work for the engine-man, rough riding) The CN&#8217;s 1900&#8242;s came with them and at this same time when CN was having theirs delivered, the Chicago &amp; Illinois Midland took delivery of 2 RS1325&#8242;s. These look just like a 1900, the difference being a sloped down short hood and smaller number boards. The New Haven had flexicoil 4 wheel trucks on the front of their FL9&#8242;s, but, the wheelbase on these was a foot longer. Info gleaned from The Second Diesel Spotter&#8217;s Guide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonaldB</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=52795#comment-58520</link>
		<dc:creator>RonaldB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 03:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/CN-4232.jpg#comment-58520</guid>
		<description>This is a great photo. Among other things, it highlights the subtle differences in CN vs CP units. For example, cab units MU-ed nose to nose &amp; also those CN &quot;lightweight&quot; Geeps are interesting. I don&#039;t know whether or not any other road had Geeps with flexicoil trucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great photo. Among other things, it highlights the subtle differences in CN vs CP units. For example, cab units MU-ed nose to nose &amp; also those CN &#8220;lightweight&#8221; Geeps are interesting. I don&#8217;t know whether or not any other road had Geeps with flexicoil trucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brundle</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=52795#comment-58508</link>
		<dc:creator>Brundle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 03:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/CN-4232.jpg#comment-58508</guid>
		<description>With just 2 years to go (Dec.4th/89 seems to be the final day for F&#039;s), how many more instances of 3 B&#039;s were likely to happen. Glad I caught one. The &quot;If Only&quot; game, if only that trailing painted window B had been behind the 4232, an ABA set of B units would have been the result. LOL :-) As they are here, that is the 9195, 9107 and 9104. The F units were on short time, the 4232 had a similar fate. Re-built in 91, I believe, to the 7035. By June, 2000, the 7035 was off the roster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With just 2 years to go (Dec.4th/89 seems to be the final day for F&#8217;s), how many more instances of 3 B&#8217;s were likely to happen. Glad I caught one. The &#8220;If Only&#8221; game, if only that trailing painted window B had been behind the 4232, an ABA set of B units would have been the result. LOL <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  As they are here, that is the 9195, 9107 and 9104. The F units were on short time, the 4232 had a similar fate. Re-built in 91, I believe, to the 7035. By June, 2000, the 7035 was off the roster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=52795#comment-58506</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 01:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/CN-4232.jpg#comment-58506</guid>
		<description>As nature intended?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As nature intended?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry.oshell</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=52795#comment-58487</link>
		<dc:creator>terry.oshell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2023 00:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/CN-4232.jpg#comment-58487</guid>
		<description>Nice photo, I like the lighting, and all the stripes lined up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice photo, I like the lighting, and all the stripes lined up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
