<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TH&amp;B&#8217;s Russel plow X786 seen waiting for winter at Aberdeen Yard.  Bruce Mercer was able to grab a few shots of the plow in service (1) at Brantford (2).</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/thbs-russel-plow-x786-seen-waiting-for-winter-at-aberdeen-yard-bruce-mercer-was-able-to-grab-a-few-shots-of-the-plow-in-service-1-at-brantford-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 15:18:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49679#comment-54075</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 18:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Acheson005_02-wtrmk.jpg#comment-54075</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much Jeremy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much Jeremy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy MacPherson</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49679#comment-54073</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy MacPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 18:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Acheson005_02-wtrmk.jpg#comment-54073</guid>
		<description>Stephen C. Host CP retired it very soon after taking over and sold it for scrap. From what I&#039;ve read it was evaluated by them and the decision was that it would need too many expensive modifications to meet CP standards. The lack of a solidly attached front coupler may have been the main issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen C. Host CP retired it very soon after taking over and sold it for scrap. From what I&#8217;ve read it was evaluated by them and the decision was that it would need too many expensive modifications to meet CP standards. The lack of a solidly attached front coupler may have been the main issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49679#comment-53286</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 14:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Acheson005_02-wtrmk.jpg#comment-53286</guid>
		<description>I wonder how long this thing lasted...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how long this thing lasted&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NiagaraMike11</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49679#comment-53272</link>
		<dc:creator>NiagaraMike11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 19:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Acheson005_02-wtrmk.jpg#comment-53272</guid>
		<description>Very nice Bruce. Oldy but goody !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice Bruce. Oldy but goody !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
