<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The combined VIA Rail trains #44 #54 #2


 yes! Three trains in One, and yes, Daily !


 a k a   Capital   Lakeshore   Canadian   Canadien


 FP9A #6532, a GMD 1957 product, leads the combined VIA on the approach to CN Scarborough Junction


  It is a humid, hot morning on the Birchmount overpass July 25, 1982 Kodachrome by S.Danko


 noteworthy


 those westbound signals are for the GECO branch junction mile 327 Kingston subdivision 


 upper right: note the GECO branch Milne Ave level crossing


  This is one of  VIA&#8217;s experiments to reduce transcontinental train costs, no Sudbury switching for the separate Toronto and Montreal sections:  82 83 84 the Ottawa valley trains were tri weekly Budd cars, Sudbury to Ottawa, by June 1, 1985 the Sudbury switching resumed with the Toronto section trains #9 and #10 
 

  colourful  


 open auto racks  
 

  more Birchmount views  


  more three in one  
 

 sdfourty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/the-combined-via-rail-trains-44-54-2-yes-three-trains-in-one-and-yes-daily-a-k-a-capital-lakeshore-canadian-canadien-fp9a-6532-a-gmd-1957-product-leads-the-co/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 02:46:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=44128#comment-44447</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2021 17:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/img303-2-1280x852.jpg#comment-44447</guid>
		<description>That &#039;air&#039; even looks heavy. I&#039;ll take your word for it that it was muggy. :o) Could not tolerate those days.
Of interest to me was all the paint changes over the years with this and other VIA locomotives. I remember 6532 in CN colours, then that trial scheme of grey/gold; now this scheme, and wondered if it ever got &#039;VIA&#039; painted on the nose before it got renumbered and then wrecked?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That &#8216;air&#8217; even looks heavy. I&#8217;ll take your word for it that it was muggy. <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> ) Could not tolerate those days.<br />
Of interest to me was all the paint changes over the years with this and other VIA locomotives. I remember 6532 in CN colours, then that trial scheme of grey/gold; now this scheme, and wondered if it ever got &#8216;VIA&#8217; painted on the nose before it got renumbered and then wrecked?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
