<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The day after shooting Friday only train 43 northbound near Mount Albert, John is back in the S-curves shooting the equipment returning south as Saturday only train 56, North Bay &#8211; Toronto via  Beaverton.  These train are listed as summer only, operating June June 25 through September 5 for the 1964 season.

Earlier that morning:
Train 52 departing Washago
52 meets 409


Scan and editing by Jacob Patterson.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/the-day-after-shooting-friday-only-train-43-northbound-near-mount-albert-john-is-back-in-the-s-curves-shooting-the-equipment-returning-south-as-saturday-only-train-56-north-bay-toronto-via-beaver/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2026 17:08:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=60046#comment-70542</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 15:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/JF_1449_02-wtrmk.jpg#comment-70542</guid>
		<description>A very under rated northbound location - naturally requiring a cloudy day to pull off. Nice stuff.

The &quot;s-curve&quot; is nice and I think it&#039;s still the same!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very under rated northbound location &#8211; naturally requiring a cloudy day to pull off. Nice stuff.</p>
<p>The &#8220;s-curve&#8221; is nice and I think it&#8217;s still the same!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
