<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated&#8221; a misquote attributed to Mark Twain seem appropriate in the case of the Cayuga Subdivision. We were all aghast at OSR abandoning the Cayuga spur and most called it the Last train &#8211; surely if OSR can&#8217;t make a go of it, no one can.
Well, like Lazarus who was raised from the dead, the Cayuga Subdivision lives on as seen in this picture, and the last train was quickly proved wrong. GIO Rail led by Gerry Gionet has returned the line to service, while they began operating two days a week and in some cases three, they&#8217;ve currently settled on a &#8216;once a week, when cars arrive&#8217; schedule as traffic remains quite light. This was the only move this week with only two revenue cars inbound for Future Transfer in Tillsonburg. Compare the above shot to my photo of Trillium&#8217;s St. Thomas and Eastern in the exact same spot 9.5 years ago. I would do this shot under OSR, Twice. GIO Rail purchased Trillium in 2018 and basically, this is essentially the return of Trillium under new management and of course with a new name and branding in this the new GIO paint scheme.

For those who keep track, things on the Cayuga are basically the same. Their current customers are Future Transfer, Townsend Lumber, and IGPC Ethanol in Aylmer. The Fertilizer place in Courtland is now gone and removed. Townsend was good for about a car or two a month, IGPC about the same (despite all their track which came as a kit when the plant was built, they used very little rail service). Future Transfer is a transload and a lot of their traffic which the Trillium Railway&#8217;s St. Thomas and Eastern had also ran is actually for Safety Kleen a used oil refinery in Breslau Ontario. When the STER closed much of their business moved to Guelph (PDI Liquids) but it would seem they have moved some of it back.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/the-reports-of-my-death-are-greatly-exaggerated-a-misquote-attributed-to-mark-twain-seem-appropriate-in-the-case-of-the-cayuga-subdivision-we-were-all-aghast-at-osr-abandoning-the-cayuga-spur-and/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 03:42:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49236#comment-62153</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/RPCA_GIO_STRSCH_8251-c.jpg#comment-62153</guid>
		<description>The pole line has been removed here, unfortunately, removing a really nice photo prop. So it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pole line has been removed here, unfortunately, removing a really nice photo prop. So it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradKetchen</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49236#comment-60161</link>
		<dc:creator>BradKetchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 13:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/RPCA_GIO_STRSCH_8251-c.jpg#comment-60161</guid>
		<description>@jfriedrich. Gentrification. Lots of it going on round here in Toronto. Sadly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jfriedrich. Gentrification. Lots of it going on round here in Toronto. Sadly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfriedrich</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49236#comment-60158</link>
		<dc:creator>jfriedrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2024 20:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/RPCA_GIO_STRSCH_8251-c.jpg#comment-60158</guid>
		<description>Not a rumor in regards to the former co-op site in Courtland. See link -&gt; https://www.simcoereformer.ca/news/local-news/semi-detached-housing-development-being-proposed-in-courtland</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a rumor in regards to the former co-op site in Courtland. See link -&gt; <a href="https://www.simcoereformer.ca/news/local-news/semi-detached-housing-development-being-proposed-in-courtland" rel="nofollow">https://www.simcoereformer.ca/news/local-news/semi-detached-housing-development-being-proposed-in-courtland</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49236#comment-60152</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2024 14:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/RPCA_GIO_STRSCH_8251-c.jpg#comment-60152</guid>
		<description>GIO has resumed storage cars.. in fact, it&#039;s probably their primary means of revenue now given how many there are on the line.

Also east of Courtland is being abandoned and rumour is the former silo/elevator site is earmarked for housing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GIO has resumed storage cars.. in fact, it&#8217;s probably their primary means of revenue now given how many there are on the line.</p>
<p>Also east of Courtland is being abandoned and rumour is the former silo/elevator site is earmarked for housing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradKetchen</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49236#comment-58342</link>
		<dc:creator>BradKetchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 14:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/RPCA_GIO_STRSCH_8251-c.jpg#comment-58342</guid>
		<description>I think we commented on another shot of Tillsonburg/Aylmer Trillium @SteveHost at the time. I stopped into the IGPC plant on the way back from a gig in London. The tracks there were plugged with tank cars. Storage maybe? And TR 3582 was sitting at Future missing it&#039;s front trucks. Glad that GIO resurrected the Cayuga.Cue the song &quot;I Am The Resurrection&quot;. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we commented on another shot of Tillsonburg/Aylmer Trillium @SteveHost at the time. I stopped into the IGPC plant on the way back from a gig in London. The tracks there were plugged with tank cars. Storage maybe? And TR 3582 was sitting at Future missing it&#8217;s front trucks. Glad that GIO resurrected the Cayuga.Cue the song &#8220;I Am The Resurrection&#8221;. <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: berknkp765</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49236#comment-54553</link>
		<dc:creator>berknkp765</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 02:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/RPCA_GIO_STRSCH_8251-c.jpg#comment-54553</guid>
		<description>Several observations from an outing today. Future will soon be transloading a granular product in a brand new fabric and steel building east of the Gio bldg. in addition they are transloading Anhydrous Ammonia to trucks with a rather ingenious portable loading dock on rubber tires. [Two of these units]. Future also has a Rail KIng shuttle on site.  The south yard track has tank cars stored  on it. Future has spent a lot of money in here with new rail beside their new bldg and paved surfaces for the trucks and weigh scales. Adient is closing as Ford has moved the F150 seat production back to Michigan. In OSRs yard there was a training session for new employees. Courtland now presents a industrial site with rail service  The silos are gone and the site almost cleared</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several observations from an outing today. Future will soon be transloading a granular product in a brand new fabric and steel building east of the Gio bldg. in addition they are transloading Anhydrous Ammonia to trucks with a rather ingenious portable loading dock on rubber tires. [Two of these units]. Future also has a Rail KIng shuttle on site.  The south yard track has tank cars stored  on it. Future has spent a lot of money in here with new rail beside their new bldg and paved surfaces for the trucks and weigh scales. Adient is closing as Ford has moved the F150 seat production back to Michigan. In OSRs yard there was a training session for new employees. Courtland now presents a industrial site with rail service  The silos are gone and the site almost cleared</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49236#comment-52791</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 18:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/RPCA_GIO_STRSCH_8251-c.jpg#comment-52791</guid>
		<description>Guess it depends on the special instructions. We don&#039;t have a copy of GIO&#039;s instructionx so we won&#039;t know the speeds allowed, they along with osr did exceed 15 mph based on anecdotal evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess it depends on the special instructions. We don&#8217;t have a copy of GIO&#8217;s instructionx so we won&#8217;t know the speeds allowed, they along with osr did exceed 15 mph based on anecdotal evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfriedrich</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49236#comment-52728</link>
		<dc:creator>jfriedrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2022 02:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/RPCA_GIO_STRSCH_8251-c.jpg#comment-52728</guid>
		<description>From the latest update of CROR --&gt; https://tc.canada.ca/en/rail-transportation/rules/2022-2023/canadian-rail-operating-rules/switches

105. Operation on Non-Main Track
Special instructions will indicate when this rule is not applicable on a specific track.

Unless otherwise provided by signal indication, a movement using non-main track must operate at REDUCED speed and be prepared to stop short of the end of track or the red signal prescribed by Rule 41.

(a) In CTC , movements may only enter a siding by signal indication or with permission from the RTC .

(b) Unless otherwise provided by signal indication or special instructions, movements operating on non-main tracks must not exceed fifteen (15) MPH .

(c) In addition to moving at REDUCED speed, a movement using a non-signalled siding or using other non-main tracks so designated in special instructions, must operate at a speed that will allow it to stop within one-half the range of vision of a track unit.

and from the CN Great Lakes Region Time Table dated 1996, 2 years prior to CN leaving operations up to Trillium initially. Will have to dig up a later time table but I don&#039;t think much will have changed. 

Rule 105 Special Instruction (1) Applicable

SPEEDS
Mile           MPH
81.0 to 95.0 - 15 
83.1 Bridge - 10 
94.6 Bridge - 10 
95.0 to 108.0 - 20 
104.8 Bridge - 20
108.0 to 119.0 - 20
113.0 Bridge - 20 

Sure it maybe arrow straight and welded rail in sections, along with being safety tied almost 10 years ago before the whole lease saga, but rules are rules and I&#039;m sure Transport Canada isn&#039;t that flexible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the latest update of CROR &#8211;&gt; <a href="https://tc.canada.ca/en/rail-transportation/rules/2022-2023/canadian-rail-operating-rules/switches" rel="nofollow">https://tc.canada.ca/en/rail-transportation/rules/2022-2023/canadian-rail-operating-rules/switches</a></p>
<p>105. Operation on Non-Main Track<br />
Special instructions will indicate when this rule is not applicable on a specific track.</p>
<p>Unless otherwise provided by signal indication, a movement using non-main track must operate at REDUCED speed and be prepared to stop short of the end of track or the red signal prescribed by Rule 41.</p>
<p>(a) In CTC , movements may only enter a siding by signal indication or with permission from the RTC .</p>
<p>(b) Unless otherwise provided by signal indication or special instructions, movements operating on non-main tracks must not exceed fifteen (15) MPH .</p>
<p>(c) In addition to moving at REDUCED speed, a movement using a non-signalled siding or using other non-main tracks so designated in special instructions, must operate at a speed that will allow it to stop within one-half the range of vision of a track unit.</p>
<p>and from the CN Great Lakes Region Time Table dated 1996, 2 years prior to CN leaving operations up to Trillium initially. Will have to dig up a later time table but I don&#8217;t think much will have changed. </p>
<p>Rule 105 Special Instruction (1) Applicable</p>
<p>SPEEDS<br />
Mile           MPH<br />
81.0 to 95.0 &#8211; 15<br />
83.1 Bridge &#8211; 10<br />
94.6 Bridge &#8211; 10<br />
95.0 to 108.0 &#8211; 20<br />
104.8 Bridge &#8211; 20<br />
108.0 to 119.0 &#8211; 20<br />
113.0 Bridge &#8211; 20 </p>
<p>Sure it maybe arrow straight and welded rail in sections, along with being safety tied almost 10 years ago before the whole lease saga, but rules are rules and I&#8217;m sure Transport Canada isn&#8217;t that flexible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Host</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49236#comment-52641</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Host</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 15:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/RPCA_GIO_STRSCH_8251-c.jpg#comment-52641</guid>
		<description>About that........ Rule 105 doesn&#039;t mean 15 MPH - some railways (CPR for example) will explicitly restrict rule 105 to 15 MPH

However, not all railways have this rule. They can go faster.

The Cayuga spur between Aylmer and Tillsonburg is arrow straight, welded rail in parts, and has only a few crossings and they can absolutely go faster.. of course they have to slow for crossings.. but there are long stretches of nothing that can allow going much beyond 15 MPH - and they do.

https://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/recommandations-recommendations/rail/1995/rec-r9502.html

&quot;Canadian Rail Operating Rules (CROR) Rule 105 governs train speed as a function of range of vision and stopping capability. To be in compliance with CROR Rule 105, crew members must assess the changing variables upon which range of vision and stopping capability depend. &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About that&#8230;&#8230;.. Rule 105 doesn&#8217;t mean 15 MPH &#8211; some railways (CPR for example) will explicitly restrict rule 105 to 15 MPH</p>
<p>However, not all railways have this rule. They can go faster.</p>
<p>The Cayuga spur between Aylmer and Tillsonburg is arrow straight, welded rail in parts, and has only a few crossings and they can absolutely go faster.. of course they have to slow for crossings.. but there are long stretches of nothing that can allow going much beyond 15 MPH &#8211; and they do.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/recommandations-recommendations/rail/1995/rec-r9502.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/recommandations-recommendations/rail/1995/rec-r9502.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Canadian Rail Operating Rules (CROR) Rule 105 governs train speed as a function of range of vision and stopping capability. To be in compliance with CROR Rule 105, crew members must assess the changing variables upon which range of vision and stopping capability depend. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfriedrich</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=49236#comment-52635</link>
		<dc:creator>jfriedrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 02:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/RPCA_GIO_STRSCH_8251-c.jpg#comment-52635</guid>
		<description>This track is all rule 105 territory, 15 MPH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This track is all rule 105 territory, 15 MPH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
