<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The very fact that VIA #71 was late this particular morning gave me a chance image that was a bit out of the ordinary. From my location on Dundas Peak I was watching the progress of #70, with two units up front, (coming from top to bottom in photo) and almost didn&#8217;t see #71 entering the picture heading west.
Too far up to catch unit numbers though. The landscape sure looks drab with no snow and a very early sun, as this image was shot around 0910 hrs.
But a neat catch.
These days, in the name of &#8220;progress&#8221;, hanging out at the Peak is not the same as it was. What was once a free hike any old time now revolves around giving money to enjoy&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..and it might be noted very few are contributing photos taken from this location as of late.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/the-very-fact-that-via-71-was-late-this-particular-morning-gave-me-a-chance-image-that-was-a-bit-out-of-the-ordinary-from-my-location-on-dundas-peak-i-was-watching-the-progress-of-70-with-two-unit/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 17:07:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercer</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38464#comment-34352</link>
		<dc:creator>mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 21:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Meet357-edited.jpg#comment-34352</guid>
		<description>Stark landscape, for sure. And 70 has 2 F40&#039;s no less !!
In the &quot;old times&quot; this would be Naked Landscape, but that too has other connotations, har har</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stark landscape, for sure. And 70 has 2 F40&#8242;s no less !!<br />
In the &#8220;old times&#8221; this would be Naked Landscape, but that too has other connotations, har har</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38464#comment-34349</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 16:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Meet357-edited.jpg#comment-34349</guid>
		<description>I agree with you 100%. You should not have to pay for what you already paid for. A good sneaky example is Spencer Smith Park. Oh, it is still free, but try finding a place to park that doesn&#039;t cost you that is within a half mile of the place. It is all about the wallet.
Tax the tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you 100%. You should not have to pay for what you already paid for. A good sneaky example is Spencer Smith Park. Oh, it is still free, but try finding a place to park that doesn&#8217;t cost you that is within a half mile of the place. It is all about the wallet.<br />
Tax the tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Streit</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=38464#comment-34348</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Streit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 16:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Meet357-edited.jpg#comment-34348</guid>
		<description>Sad, but true. My thought is that as a TAX PAYER I have ALREADY contributed to the creation/maintenance of municipal venues. Funny, don&#039;t recall reading of any exemptions in my very detailed tax invoice statements! I wonder who will be first to take up a contemporary &#039;Peak&#039; challenge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad, but true. My thought is that as a TAX PAYER I have ALREADY contributed to the creation/maintenance of municipal venues. Funny, don&#8217;t recall reading of any exemptions in my very detailed tax invoice statements! I wonder who will be first to take up a contemporary &#8216;Peak&#8217; challenge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
