<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This empty coal train is crossing the Eagle River at Malakwa behind CP nos.8788&amp;5003. The SD30ECO units were used on CP coal trains from mid 2014 for about a year until mechanical problems caused their demise. At the present time ES44ACs and AC4400s are used consistently as prime power units.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/this-empty-coal-train-is-crossing-the-eagle-river-at-malakwa-behind-cp-nos-87885003-the-sd30eco-units-were-used-on-cp-coal-trains-from-mid-2014-for-about-a-year-until-mechanical-problems-caused/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 05:18:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spallumcheen</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=27932#comment-19141</link>
		<dc:creator>Spallumcheen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 20:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/DSC_0175.jpg#comment-19141</guid>
		<description>There are a lot of these truss style bridges on the Shuswap sub between Sicamous and Revelstoke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of these truss style bridges on the Shuswap sub between Sicamous and Revelstoke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=27932#comment-19138</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 12:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/DSC_0175.jpg#comment-19138</guid>
		<description>Pity the bridge is not dated overhead as a lot of the American ones are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pity the bridge is not dated overhead as a lot of the American ones are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Brook</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=27932#comment-19127</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Brook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/DSC_0175.jpg#comment-19127</guid>
		<description>SD30&#039;s couldn&#039;t handle the workload...as many predicted? Pity, as they look great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SD30&#8242;s couldn&#8217;t handle the workload&#8230;as many predicted? Pity, as they look great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Extra 1014</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=27932#comment-19122</link>
		<dc:creator>Extra 1014</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/DSC_0175.jpg#comment-19122</guid>
		<description>I like the SD30 as part of the lineup. I just love the little bridge. That thing must have some real age to it. Most short bridges are usually done without any overhead structure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the SD30 as part of the lineup. I just love the little bridge. That thing must have some real age to it. Most short bridges are usually done without any overhead structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
