<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TRRY 108 leads its train across Bridge 17 of the old Welland Canal. The lift bridge hasn&#8217;t been operational since the early 1970s.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/trry-108-leads-its-train-across-bridge-17-of-the-old-welland-canal-the-lift-bridge-hasnt-been-operational-since-the-early-1970s/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 06:13:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoctaPinklaces</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=24127#comment-14145</link>
		<dc:creator>DoctaPinklaces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 02:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/IMG_8867ps-1.jpg#comment-14145</guid>
		<description>I think it goes to service Port Colbourne/ Welland when the St Catharines job is out but I might be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it goes to service Port Colbourne/ Welland when the St Catharines job is out but I might be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Odette</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=24127#comment-14144</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Odette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/IMG_8867ps-1.jpg#comment-14144</guid>
		<description>Ah. From what it appears, 3582 has been sitting in the same position at that scrap yard in north Welland for a few months now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah. From what it appears, 3582 has been sitting in the same position at that scrap yard in north Welland for a few months now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoctaPinklaces</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=24127#comment-14141</link>
		<dc:creator>DoctaPinklaces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/IMG_8867ps-1.jpg#comment-14141</guid>
		<description>Dan, 1859 is still active. 3582 is, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, 1859 is still active. 3582 is, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Odette</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=24127#comment-14140</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Odette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/IMG_8867ps-1.jpg#comment-14140</guid>
		<description>Awesome composition! 108 has managed to stay around in the active roster after all these years. Its counterpart 110 is currently deadlined, along with 1842, 3582 and 7024. I think 1859 is still active.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome composition! 108 has managed to stay around in the active roster after all these years. Its counterpart 110 is currently deadlined, along with 1842, 3582 and 7024. I think 1859 is still active.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
