<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two AC locos 2831 and 2843 storm up Woodstock bank with a mixed freight on the north track.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/two-ac-locos-2831-and-2843-storm-up-woodstock-bank-with-a-mixed-freight-on-the-north-track/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 18:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=19128#comment-9329</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 02:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/IMG_14531.jpg#comment-9329</guid>
		<description>It was 332</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was 332</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowesy</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=19128#comment-9324</link>
		<dc:creator>lowesy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 13:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/IMG_14531.jpg#comment-9324</guid>
		<description>Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Sanders</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=19128#comment-9323</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 13:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/IMG_14531.jpg#comment-9323</guid>
		<description>It would most likely be 384 then. 385 usually has quite a few loaded ones</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would most likely be 384 then. 385 usually has quite a few loaded ones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowesy</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=19128#comment-9322</link>
		<dc:creator>lowesy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 12:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/IMG_14531.jpg#comment-9322</guid>
		<description>The rear of the train consisted of many empty centrebeam cars if that&#039;s any help?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rear of the train consisted of many empty centrebeam cars if that&#8217;s any help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Sanders</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=19128#comment-9321</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 01:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/IMG_14531.jpg#comment-9321</guid>
		<description>Probably 382 or 332?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably 382 or 332?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
