<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Via 78 makes a late station stop at Brantford after being held up at Hardy for signal issues and 434/435 to clear.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/via-78-makes-a-late-station-stop-at-brantford-after-being-held-up-at-hardy-for-signal-issues-and-434435-to-clear/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 14:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: railwayguy</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=36642#comment-39466</link>
		<dc:creator>railwayguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2020 14:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/DSC_0449.jpg#comment-39466</guid>
		<description>Very, very nice Mr. Bishop, a beautiful picture of a beautiful railway station as well as VIA 908. Well done !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very, very nice Mr. Bishop, a beautiful picture of a beautiful railway station as well as VIA 908. Well done !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=36642#comment-31743</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 23:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/DSC_0449.jpg#comment-31743</guid>
		<description>It is not often at all. They had to get a 107 protection for 581 who was sitting around the corner at Brant Junction on the South track. RTC let 581 slip out of the yard between 434 and 78. I’d assume 78 stayed on the North since 435 was just clear of Hardy. 78 went to the south at Massey’s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not often at all. They had to get a 107 protection for 581 who was sitting around the corner at Brant Junction on the South track. RTC let 581 slip out of the yard between 434 and 78. I’d assume 78 stayed on the North since 435 was just clear of Hardy. 78 went to the south at Massey’s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercer</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=36642#comment-31741</link>
		<dc:creator>mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 21:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/DSC_0449.jpg#comment-31741</guid>
		<description>Nice one Mr. B.
How often does this happen, having 1 or the other of 78, 79 on the North ??
Sure hope protection is arranged beforehand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one Mr. B.<br />
How often does this happen, having 1 or the other of 78, 79 on the North ??<br />
Sure hope protection is arranged beforehand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
