<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VIA 907 made it&#8217;s second appearance on train 72 today wearing the &#8220;Canada 150&#8243; wrap.  It was also on 72 on Tuesday, but received a bath between runs and looked more presentable today.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/via-907-made-its-second-appearance-on-train-72-today-wearing-the-canada-150-wrap-it-was-also-on-72-on-tuesday-but-received-a-bath-between-runs-and-looked-more-presentable-today/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 15:50:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28578#comment-20175</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 13:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/DSC_2718m.jpg#comment-20175</guid>
		<description>Not bad, Rob. Clean ugly is somewhat better than dirty ugly. Sometimes it disappoints me that I am so old that I can remember when we celebrated something, we put an honest effort into a commemorative design. To me, this looks more like 150 Years of Toilet Paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not bad, Rob. Clean ugly is somewhat better than dirty ugly. Sometimes it disappoints me that I am so old that I can remember when we celebrated something, we put an honest effort into a commemorative design. To me, this looks more like 150 Years of Toilet Paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Bishop</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28578#comment-20168</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/DSC_2718m.jpg#comment-20168</guid>
		<description>Wait until you see the shots of 6454 Phil :P

Glad you got it Rob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait until you see the shots of 6454 Phil <img src='http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Glad you got it Rob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ngineered4u</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=28578#comment-20167</link>
		<dc:creator>ngineered4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/DSC_2718m.jpg#comment-20167</guid>
		<description>Great shot. Awful paint scheme. Its our 150th. VIA could have done better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great shot. Awful paint scheme. Its our 150th. VIA could have done better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
