<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: W914&#8242;s CWR set had been set out from the previous night&#8217;s 451 along with one cylindrical hopper for KWH Pipe (Uponor) in town. The power, IC 2463, ran light down from North Bay to pick it up and take it north to the Trout Creek area but first they motored past the north end and on the main and after pausing at the yard office for a couple of minutes, continued south to disconnect the hopper before heading back to the north end of the trainset to hook up and get down to business.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/w914s-cwr-set-had-been-set-out-from-the-previous-nights-451-along-with-one-cylindrical-hopper-for-kwh-pipe-uponor-in-town-the-power-ic-2463-ran-light-down-from-north-bay-to-pick-it-up-and-tak/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 22:27:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Steinman</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26336#comment-17077</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Steinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 21:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/20161003013.jpg#comment-17077</guid>
		<description>For a second I thought they were tearing out...seems to be the norm these days. But yes, agree with you Dave Brook...more trains would be nice on the subdivision again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a second I thought they were tearing out&#8230;seems to be the norm these days. But yes, agree with you Dave Brook&#8230;more trains would be nice on the subdivision again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Brook</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=26336#comment-17065</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Brook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 18:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/20161003013.jpg#comment-17065</guid>
		<description>Nice to know the Newmarket Sub is getting some fresh rail. Now it just needs a few more trains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to know the Newmarket Sub is getting some fresh rail. Now it just needs a few more trains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
