<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We find a very interesting lash up on todays CP 242 with CP 8720 (ES44AC) leading CP 2264 (GP20C-ECO) and CEFX 6009 (GMD SD60). The CEFX 6009 was sold in 2006 to the Indiana Railway as Ex-SOO 6009 according to the CTG and shows as O left. Some how it has made its way to CEFX but still shows its original white and red SOO colours.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/we-find-a-very-interesting-lash-up-on-todays-cp-242-with-cp-8720-es44ac-leading-cp-2264-gp20c-eco-and-cefx-6009-gmd-sd60-the-cefx-6009-was-sold-in-2006-to-the-indiana-railway-as-ex-soo-6009-acc/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 18:00:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercer</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25164#comment-15799</link>
		<dc:creator>mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 01:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/IMG_2334-3.jpg#comment-15799</guid>
		<description>And now 6009 is off to CAD Lachine Que for semi major work ( electrical probs etc) as CEFX utilizes CAD for contract work; it had been in possession of ZTR at the OSR Salford complex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now 6009 is off to CAD Lachine Que for semi major work ( electrical probs etc) as CEFX utilizes CAD for contract work; it had been in possession of ZTR at the OSR Salford complex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercer</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25164#comment-15798</link>
		<dc:creator>mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 01:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/IMG_2334-3.jpg#comment-15798</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t think they were ever *sold* to INRD, merely lettered for them on a 2-3 year lease; all but 6013 are the property of CIT Equipment/ CEFX since CP dropped the renewal on them back then. They were used by INRD to repay horsepower hours to CP for the Rosemont coke trains</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t think they were ever *sold* to INRD, merely lettered for them on a 2-3 year lease; all but 6013 are the property of CIT Equipment/ CEFX since CP dropped the renewal on them back then. They were used by INRD to repay horsepower hours to CP for the Rosemont coke trains</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25164#comment-15643</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 10:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/IMG_2334-3.jpg#comment-15643</guid>
		<description>I recall seeing x-SOO 6011 lettered &quot;Indiana Rwy&quot; running on CP&#039;s #254 back in 11/2011. And a forgotten number in the series on CN&#039;s #271 around that time as well. Consider this a rare catch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall seeing x-SOO 6011 lettered &#8220;Indiana Rwy&#8221; running on CP&#8217;s #254 back in 11/2011. And a forgotten number in the series on CN&#8217;s #271 around that time as well. Consider this a rare catch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
