<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Well, for me this defies explanation.  I do know someone out there will have one.  Here is GO 9832 cab control car with a couple of single level cars behind it followed by 5 bilevels and GO 506 (out of pic). Why this combination? Equipment shortage? I&#8217;ve never seen another GO train quite like this since.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/well-for-me-this-defies-explanation-i-do-know-someone-out-there-will-have-one-here-is-go-9832-cab-control-car-with-a-couple-of-single-level-cars-behind-it-followed-by-5-bilevels-and-go-506-out-o/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 18:20:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Streit</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35655#comment-30250</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Streit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/gobayw078-edited.jpg#comment-30250</guid>
		<description>First bi-level coaches; 1977, first bi-level cab cars; 1983. Six years of intermingling!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First bi-level coaches; 1977, first bi-level cab cars; 1983. Six years of intermingling!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ngineered4u</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35655#comment-30247</link>
		<dc:creator>ngineered4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 03:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/gobayw078-edited.jpg#comment-30247</guid>
		<description>I was a brakeman on the single level cars and by the time I became conductor in 84 most of the GO coaches were bi levels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a brakeman on the single level cars and by the time I became conductor in 84 most of the GO coaches were bi levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35655#comment-30244</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 03:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/gobayw078-edited.jpg#comment-30244</guid>
		<description>Thanks guys. Well so much for that being a mystery. I don&#039;t know if I have any other shots with this sort of combination, thats why I asked about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys. Well so much for that being a mystery. I don&#8217;t know if I have any other shots with this sort of combination, thats why I asked about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Odette</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35655#comment-30235</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Odette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 01:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/gobayw078-edited.jpg#comment-30235</guid>
		<description>The bilevel cabcars didn&#039;t come along until 84, meanwhile the bilevel coaches were already approaching a decade in use at that point. This happened quite a bit, though I think one single level Hawker and a set of bilevels behind it were more common.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bilevel cabcars didn&#8217;t come along until 84, meanwhile the bilevel coaches were already approaching a decade in use at that point. This happened quite a bit, though I think one single level Hawker and a set of bilevels behind it were more common.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Brook</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35655#comment-30232</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Brook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/gobayw078-edited.jpg#comment-30232</guid>
		<description>Like John, I saw this several times on the Georgetown line as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like John, I saw this several times on the Georgetown line as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Eull</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35655#comment-30231</link>
		<dc:creator>John Eull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/gobayw078-edited.jpg#comment-30231</guid>
		<description>Actually, single level cab cars with bilevels were common for a while...presumably while the bilevel cab cars were still being delivered. I have several shots of them myself--John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, single level cab cars with bilevels were common for a while&#8230;presumably while the bilevel cab cars were still being delivered. I have several shots of them myself&#8211;John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colm</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=35655#comment-30230</link>
		<dc:creator>Colm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 22:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/gobayw078-edited.jpg#comment-30230</guid>
		<description>Wow. Now there’s an interesting train</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Now there’s an interesting train</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
