<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why can&#8217;t all trains be like this? Former Cotton Belt tunnel motor 3054 leads 3394 and 3403 on their westbound trip from Mac Yard.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/why-cant-all-trains-be-like-this-former-cotton-belt-tunnel-motor-3054-leads-3394-and-3403-on-their-westbound-trip-from-mac-yard/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 15:18:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Blampied</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=33801#comment-27198</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Blampied</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2018 19:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/GEXR3054_3394_RLHH3403_T431_GeorgetownCAN_2June2018_RE_2.jpg#comment-27198</guid>
		<description>Thanks! If you look at some of CN&#039;s leasers right now, logos are still very evident, especially on the ex-CSX units.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! If you look at some of CN&#8217;s leasers right now, logos are still very evident, especially on the ex-CSX units.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradKetchen</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=33801#comment-27197</link>
		<dc:creator>BradKetchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2018 19:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/GEXR3054_3394_RLHH3403_T431_GeorgetownCAN_2June2018_RE_2.jpg#comment-27197</guid>
		<description>Too bad they didn&#039;t retain the old Southern Pacific logo.. But  guess it&#039;s protocol. Nice shot Thomas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad they didn&#8217;t retain the old Southern Pacific logo.. But  guess it&#8217;s protocol. Nice shot Thomas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
