<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yeah, the &#8216;race&#8217; was on. Pity I cannot remember who won!!  Actually, I think it was the CN 449 that got my attention and since it was on the south track&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.and along comes CP, hidden as it rounded the curve. This was a great experience of remarkable timing; and as both trains were Hamilton-bound they were moving right along. And both trains had Alcos in consist, such units had been demoted to trailing power a couple of years previous. CP 5906, 4742 and 4221 made up #526, bound for the USA, and CN #449, it worked Hamilton&#8217;s Stuart St yard (the yard wasn&#8217;t handed to RLK until end of 1997) before going to Niagara Falls from Toronto. Pity I made an error in logging this train, I omitted the 3rd unit, so only can show CN 9499, 2338,xxxx and 1396. Since CP does not pay for rights over the Oakville Sub any more, chances of a sighting like this again are slim and none.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/yeah-the-race-was-on-pity-i-cannot-remember-who-won-actually-i-think-it-was-the-cn-449-that-got-my-attention-and-since-it-was-on-the-south-track-and-along-comes-cp-hidden-as-it-rou/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 18:42:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lockwood</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31029#comment-24114</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lockwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 22:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/449-526570-edited.jpg#comment-24114</guid>
		<description>Third CN unit is an M636, so 23**.

I recall shooting a memorable 449 one inter afternoon down in Port Rob in 1998. They made a lift in the yard and headed to Fort Eire or Buffalo. I do not recall seeing 449 before or after that one time at Port Rob, but at the very least it could operate past Niagara Falls yard if needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Third CN unit is an M636, so 23**.</p>
<p>I recall shooting a memorable 449 one inter afternoon down in Port Rob in 1998. They made a lift in the yard and headed to Fort Eire or Buffalo. I do not recall seeing 449 before or after that one time at Port Rob, but at the very least it could operate past Niagara Falls yard if needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Snyder</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31029#comment-23885</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Snyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/449-526570-edited.jpg#comment-23885</guid>
		<description>Another fantastic shot Mr Mooney!  And a thank you to ngineered4u for the additional info as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another fantastic shot Mr Mooney!  And a thank you to ngineered4u for the additional info as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ngineered4u</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31029#comment-23824</link>
		<dc:creator>ngineered4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 08:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/449-526570-edited.jpg#comment-23824</guid>
		<description>Those were the good old days when the Toronto freight pool had lots of work compared to the zero trains we have now.
Toronto crews manned 448/449, 154 which stopped at BIT to lift stack cars for Buffalo plus we had 339/338 Mac to Frontier Yard and return and I forget the train number, but we ran Mac Yrd to Bison Yard on the NS. Man we lost lots of work down that way. Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those were the good old days when the Toronto freight pool had lots of work compared to the zero trains we have now.<br />
Toronto crews manned 448/449, 154 which stopped at BIT to lift stack cars for Buffalo plus we had 339/338 Mac to Frontier Yard and return and I forget the train number, but we ran Mac Yrd to Bison Yard on the NS. Man we lost lots of work down that way. Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ngineered4u</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31029#comment-23823</link>
		<dc:creator>ngineered4u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 08:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/449-526570-edited.jpg#comment-23823</guid>
		<description>448/449 were Mac Yrd to Niagara Falls trains. Usually with work at Aldershot or Hamilton. 449 was westbound out of Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>448/449 were Mac Yrd to Niagara Falls trains. Usually with work at Aldershot or Hamilton. 449 was westbound out of Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31029#comment-23820</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/449-526570-edited.jpg#comment-23820</guid>
		<description>Tisk, tisk. You&#039;re not old enough to be forgetful.:o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tisk, tisk. You&#8217;re not old enough to be forgetful.:o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoctaPinklaces</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31029#comment-23819</link>
		<dc:creator>DoctaPinklaces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/449-526570-edited.jpg#comment-23819</guid>
		<description>Gotcha. I recall hearing that ID a while ago but I&#039;ve since forgotten about it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotcha. I recall hearing that ID a while ago but I&#8217;ve since forgotten about it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: awmooney</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31029#comment-23817</link>
		<dc:creator>awmooney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/449-526570-edited.jpg#comment-23817</guid>
		<description>First; thanks guys, for the positive comments. And secondly, no, Docta; I believe this train terminated at Niagara Falls CN yard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First; thanks guys, for the positive comments. And secondly, no, Docta; I believe this train terminated at Niagara Falls CN yard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoctaPinklaces</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31029#comment-23813</link>
		<dc:creator>DoctaPinklaces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 21:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/449-526570-edited.jpg#comment-23813</guid>
		<description>Was 449 a Ft.Erie bound train?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was 449 a Ft.Erie bound train?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PacificPaul</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31029#comment-23810</link>
		<dc:creator>PacificPaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 20:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/449-526570-edited.jpg#comment-23810</guid>
		<description>Great image indeed!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great image indeed!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Streit</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=31029#comment-23808</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Streit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/449-526570-edited.jpg#comment-23808</guid>
		<description>Definitely twilight for the MLW&#039;s. CN&#039;s privatization was only a year off and the new regime had no interest in nostalgia. Hard to believe that the once ubiquitous SD40-2&#039;s are succumbing to a similar fate. Life cycle, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely twilight for the MLW&#8217;s. CN&#8217;s privatization was only a year off and the new regime had no interest in nostalgia. Hard to believe that the once ubiquitous SD40-2&#8242;s are succumbing to a similar fate. Life cycle, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
