<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stelco 78, their first GMD SW900 built May 1956, is seen in CN&#8217;s London Yard in a winter circa 1995. My 1994 edition of Canadian Trackside Guide lists it among Stelco&#8217;s locomotives, but by the 1996 edition it&#8217;s gone. 
Note the black line along the walkway and cab, suspect it&#8217;s a jumper airbrake hose bypassing the locomotive.  The gondola CN 157078 behind is loaded with looks-like a diesel engine and an AAR-A switcher truck. Another image from the same film strip shows SW8 Stelco 76. My impression is that both #76 and #78 were retired from Stelco at this point.
CN 5035, the SD40 on the track beyond #78, is back-to-back with a similar-looking CN locomotive also ending in &#8220;35&#8243; (could be CN 5135). 
Location mapped is approximate.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.railpictures.ca/upload/stelco-78-their-first-gmd-sw900-built-may-1956-is-seen-in-cns-london-yard-in-a-winter-circa-1995-my-1994-edition-of-canadian-trackside-guide-lists-it-among-stelcos-locomotives-but-by-the-1996/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.railpictures.ca</link>
	<description>The BEST Canadian photos on the Internet, eh?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 18:00:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp4pix</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=37144#comment-32549</link>
		<dc:creator>jp4pix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 03:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/stelco78_cnLondonON_199x_L.jpg#comment-32549</guid>
		<description>My image of Stelco 76 in this train has been accepted. I quoted most of Mr Mercer&#039;s comment in the caption, hope that&#039;s OK, thanks.
http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=37185
It&#039;s possible that #78 and #76 are separated by just the gondola CN 157078, if it is longer than an SD40.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My image of Stelco 76 in this train has been accepted. I quoted most of Mr Mercer&#8217;s comment in the caption, hope that&#8217;s OK, thanks.<br />
<a href="http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=37185" rel="nofollow">http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=37185</a><br />
It&#8217;s possible that #78 and #76 are separated by just the gondola CN 157078, if it is longer than an SD40.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp4pix</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=37144#comment-32495</link>
		<dc:creator>jp4pix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2019 18:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/stelco78_cnLondonON_199x_L.jpg#comment-32495</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that very interesting information, Bruce. 
The image I have of Stelco 76 is right hand side, part of the same train, similar distance and same-day weather - too bad the front truck is partly hidden by a tie pile.  The cut off cab of the GE is in the gondola next to 76 ! Maybe I should submit that image ?  Also have a left-hand side of #71 by itself, most likely in London, on a different day with not as much snow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that very interesting information, Bruce.<br />
The image I have of Stelco 76 is right hand side, part of the same train, similar distance and same-day weather &#8211; too bad the front truck is partly hidden by a tie pile.  The cut off cab of the GE is in the gondola next to 76 ! Maybe I should submit that image ?  Also have a left-hand side of #71 by itself, most likely in London, on a different day with not as much snow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mercer</title>
		<link>http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=37144#comment-32493</link>
		<dc:creator>mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2019 17:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railpictures.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/stelco78_cnLondonON_199x_L.jpg#comment-32493</guid>
		<description>Great catch !
There were 6 Stelco engines disposed of during Jan/Feb 1995. They all shipped CN to Windsor and then CSX to McDonald Ohio for buyer Larry&#039;s Truck Electric.
SW-8 71, 74, and 76; SW900 78, 79; and G.E. 80ton 54.
The G.E. plus 74 and 79 were all in pieces, in gondolas, the others were able to move on their wheels (and yes, that would be a straight-air hose passing thru the dead engine to the cars ahead/behind it.
71 later became LTEX 801 and has been leased by them to a couple of various customers.It then got re-engined and became LTEX 925 and was leased to a frac sand unloader in Colorado.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great catch !<br />
There were 6 Stelco engines disposed of during Jan/Feb 1995. They all shipped CN to Windsor and then CSX to McDonald Ohio for buyer Larry&#8217;s Truck Electric.<br />
SW-8 71, 74, and 76; SW900 78, 79; and G.E. 80ton 54.<br />
The G.E. plus 74 and 79 were all in pieces, in gondolas, the others were able to move on their wheels (and yes, that would be a straight-air hose passing thru the dead engine to the cars ahead/behind it.<br />
71 later became LTEX 801 and has been leased by them to a couple of various customers.It then got re-engined and became LTEX 925 and was leased to a frac sand unloader in Colorado.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
