Welcome Visitor. First time here? Like what you see? Bookmark us for when you are bored, and check out 'top shots' and 'fantastic (editors choice)' in the menu above, you won't be dissapointed. Join our community! click here to sign up for an account today. Sick of this message? Get rid of it by logging-in here.



The wide nose looked so much better on a cowl-ed unit than it did on the narrow body, don't you think?
Copyright Notice: This image ©Steve Young all rights reserved.



Caption: The wide nose looked so much better on a cowl-ed unit than it did on the narrow body, don't you think?

Photographer:
Steve Young [781] (more) (contact)
Date: 04/12/1988 (search)
Railway: Canadian National (search)
Reporting Marks: CN 5424 (search)
Train Symbol: n/a (search)
Subdivision/SNS: Calder Shops (search)
City/Town: Edmonton (search)
Province: Alberta (search)
Share Link: http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=25578
Click here to Log-in or Register and add your vote.

7 Favourites
Photographers like Gold.Log-in or Register to show appreciation
View count: 1009 Views

Share this image on Facebook, Twitter or email using the icons below
Photo ID: 24429

Sorry, there is no map for this photo. Photographer did not add GPS co-ordinates. Please add next time or ask for a correction to this photo.

All comments must be positive in nature and abide by site rules. Anything else may be removed without warning.

9 Comments
  1. I believe only 4 of those survive (SD50F’s). The rest were scrapped.

  2. Not by a long shot. SD40-2W’s were far better to operate than any cowl unit, hands down.

  3. Oh yeah. Everyone says the 40-2′s the best locomotive out there.

    But I did read that all except for 4 of the SD50F’s were scrapped. Either that or I shouldn’t read all I can read. lol.

  4. I think that the SD50 was not one EMD’s most loved designs, and I would suspect that very few survive.
    With regard to operation, I suspect that ladder entrance and limited visibility, in spite of the “Draper Taper”, made them less desirable to the crews.
    My original comment is purely based on aesthetics.

  5. I do know NS is converting some of them to SD40E’s. I also read that taxing the 16-645F3B to it’s limits at 3600hp was the nail in the coffin. Conrail apparently loved them.

    But once again, that’s reading all I can read.

    I would not doubt for a second the “less than desirable to crews” statement.

    And to the OP, no offense. And my apologies if I did offend. Aside from that, it is a good pic. Shows the difference.

  6. Hey Driver, no offense taken. All is good.

  7. @Driver, yes i think the 40-2′s is one of the best units ever built. I am not sure how many of the SD50F’s survive other than a few i have seen on shortlines.

  8. Hey Steve, really enjoying your photos. Beautiful shots.
    I think your original comments about aesthetics is correct. If I see a F/FP45 I do love shooting pics of them over a standard cab, but I think its because they are rare these days.

  9. Thank you. I am glad that can share my photos and folks are enjoying seeing them.

Railpictures.ca © 2006-2023 all rights reserved. Photographs are copyright of the photographer and used with permission
Terms and conditions | About us