Welcome Visitor. First time here? Like what you see? Bookmark us for when you are bored, and check out 'top shots' and 'fantastic (editors choice)' in the menu above, you won't be dissapointed. Join our community!
click here to sign up for an account today. Sick of this message? Get rid of it by
logging-in here.
AC likely more cost effective / better use of HP.
I’ll take a stab at it, please feel free to add or correct the following. In my limited understanding, locomotives, just like cars went from using DC generators to using AC alternators. In your car, there is a little bank of solid state devices converting/rectifying that AC to DC so that the battery will stay charged. Again, “I believe”, the GP38ac was the initial start of the -2 line of locos. By using an alternator, this simplified the DC system that was being used with all the larger relays and transition etc etc. So, it could be said that modular electronics came into reality with the -2 line of locos (for GM). The troubled DC system was replaced with plug in electronics. Just like in a car, the AC power still has to be converted/rectified to DC on dash 2′s, those are still DC traction motors in the trucks. Today’s locos use AC traction motors, but that AC from the alternator still has to be converted into 3 phase before it can be fed to the traction motors. Or something like that, I won’t pretend to understand what is going on under the hood of a modern AC unit.
Steve, those AC traction motors are all the rage in road units because they can dig down much deeper than a DC traction motor. No stalling of brushes on the commutator.
Let the sacrifice begin.
LLPX 2210 is a GP38AC! This unit was on GEXR for a long time..
Nicely done!
Thanks gang