Welcome Visitor. First time here? Like what you see? Bookmark us for when you are bored, and check out 'top shots' and 'fantastic (editors choice)' in the menu above, you won't be dissapointed. Join our community! click here to sign up for an account today. Sick of this message? Get rid of it by logging-in here.

Solid autorack trains CN X276 and CN 276 are parked on CN's Montreal Sub, both led by SD75I's. Out of sight between them is a third parked train, CN 306. CN X276 has CN 5679 & CN 5613 for power, while CN 276 has CN 5707 & CN 2665. CN 276 normally terminates in Ontario, but both of these trains will eventually head to Joffre yard near Quebec City.
Copyright Notice: This image ©Michael Berry all rights reserved.



Caption: Solid autorack trains CN X276 and CN 276 are parked on CN's Montreal Sub, both led by SD75I's. Out of sight between them is a third parked train, CN 306. CN X276 has CN 5679 & CN 5613 for power, while CN 276 has CN 5707 & CN 2665. CN 276 normally terminates in Ontario, but both of these trains will eventually head to Joffre yard near Quebec City.

Photographer:
Michael Berry [3936] (more) (contact)
Date: 03/01/2020 (search)
Railway: Canadian National (search)
Reporting Marks: CN 5707 (search)
Train Symbol: CN 276 (search)
Subdivision/SNS: CN Montreal Sub (search)
City/Town: Montreal West (search)
Province: Quebec (search)
Share Link: http://www.railpictures.ca/?attachment_id=40479
Click here to Log-in or Register and add your vote.

6 Favourites
Photographers like Gold.Log-in or Register to show appreciation
View count: 761 Views

Share this image on Facebook, Twitter or email using the icons below
Photo ID: 39274
Map courtesy of Open Street Map

Full size | Suncalc
Note: Read why maps changed. Suncalc.net for reference only.

All comments must be positive in nature and abide by site rules. Anything else may be removed without warning.

3 Comments
  1. Snake2
    March 3, 2020 at 6:54 am

    Hi Michael….were either of these rack trains loads ?

  2. mberry
    March 3, 2020 at 8:50 am

    They would have to be.

  3. Tim Stevens
    March 3, 2020 at 11:40 pm

    Both loaded, correct.
Railpictures.ca © 2006-2023 all rights reserved. Photographs are copyright of the photographer and used with permission
Terms and conditions | About us